Subscribe Now

[hb-subscribe]

Trending News

T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
  • Activity
    • 2 hours, 30 minutes ago
      D-connect likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      I have an MA in writing and lit, but gobbledegook is gobbledegook. The fancy term is obscurantism.
    • 2 hours, 30 minutes ago
      D-connect likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      They change all the time. Generally not in a direction to improve my health, but to increase the money in their wallet.
    • 2 hours, 32 minutes ago
      D-connect likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 3 hours, 20 minutes ago
      Ahh Life likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      I have an MA in writing and lit, but gobbledegook is gobbledegook. The fancy term is obscurantism.
    • 3 hours, 20 minutes ago
      Ahh Life likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      Extremely. I have a certificate in Medical Billing & Coding.
    • 7 hours ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      "Slightly," I think, maybe. Insurance companies change their policies, constantly. Prescription coverage changes every time I look at it. Medicare is a huge question mark. Honestly, Health insurance has become a big money making business, for them. I get different answers every time I call, depending upon whom I am talking with. I say it's time for socialized medicine.
    • 7 hours, 1 minute ago
      atr likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 7 hours, 13 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Roughly half my lows are caused by my auto correct system now. I expect AI hallucinations to make it worse. I have enough hallucinations when I'm low and need non-hallucinatory help. We all need more info on this subject to make better decisions. As my favorite 80's AI robot (Johnny 5) said, "Need input."
    • 7 hours, 13 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I'm not comfortable for many reasons: 1) AI hasn't proven respects boundaries, quite the opposite, too many reports of AI tend to view its responsibilities and decisions as NOT mine; 2) the companies behind AI systems do likewise in not respecting my data as mine and jumble it in with their own; 3) AI systems haven't proven themselves as reliable parties regarding data and actions. There are many more; AI systems have a long way to go before I entrust one with dosing strategies while I'm awake, let alone while I'm asleep!
    • 7 hours, 14 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I’ve done a large 2 week focus group through Syracuse University on AI. I’ve also been watching shows on European news about AI and medical issues. AI still has too many glitches when it comes to medical issues.
    • 7 hours, 29 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 7 hours, 35 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Having recently dealt with ongoing tech issues involving our heat and electrical-use notifications for more than six months — and it’s still not fully resolved — I’m not always a fan of too much technology. That said, I am interested in advances like the Twist Insulin Pump potentially detecting scar tissue or helping with infusion-site issues. But then reality kicks in: taking devices off for MRIs, replacing failed equipment, and navigating Medicare when it’s primary insurance can become a nightmare of paperwork and delays. And honestly, AI in some call centers has been pretty frustrating. Sometimes it feels like no one can answer a real-world question anymore. I think we should tread lightly and make sure technology actually makes life easier for people living with T1D — especially older adults who already manage enough complexity every day. Some days I think about a less stress free life and going back to a syringe and insulin. over 45 years of doing that, and now 25+ of devices, I'm tired of the challenges in getting replacements, and scar tissue, and mail order supplies and on and on.
    • 7 hours, 47 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 1 day, 3 hours ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all technical advancements there are good things and bad things. The bad things (unforseen consequences) could be deadly like Hallucinations for the user, getting over doses of insulin. So, carefully thought out guard rails need to be developed and thoroughly tested. A good thing must be the accumulation of scenarios that KSannie mentioned. However it can not be completely autonomous. The current accuracy of Dex G7 and other sensors introduce error in to the calculations. This is similar to "self driving cars." The Robo taxi experiments have shown the unusual events that could become dangerous. Either audible situation commands or textual inputs like "goin to bed" or "driving" or "exercising" may be required at the beginning for a new user. As an example, after wearing my smart watch for a year now, it recognizes exercising without me having to tell it I'm exercising. This drives a more advanced and improved user interface. The other perceivable advantage might be accumulating changes over time, such as sicknesses, weight gain or loss, or changes in activity. Changes in food intake might be difficult to overcome. Something like "Under my Fork" app. Personally, I would like to see a reminder to bolis before eating! With all that said, we do we need all that? Probably not. Evolution of modified closed loop control may eliminate the need for AI control. The reality may be somewhere in-between the two.
    • 1 day, 3 hours ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 1 day, 3 hours ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I’m uncomfortable not knowing when and when it isn’t being used, but I’m not sure why really. A “singer” named Benny Rivers popped up in one of my feeds. I really liked the music, until I found out it was a total AI fabrication. Then I was uncomfortable. Why? I felt “taken”, like someone pulled a fast one on me, pulled the wool over my eyes. I liked the music less then. I didn’t like that I couldn’t find a tour date, things like that. But I was most uncomfortable not truly understanding why it made me uncomfortable. The music was still enjoyable.
    • 1 day, 4 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Having recently dealt with ongoing tech issues involving our heat and electrical-use notifications for more than six months — and it’s still not fully resolved — I’m not always a fan of too much technology. That said, I am interested in advances like the Twist Insulin Pump potentially detecting scar tissue or helping with infusion-site issues. But then reality kicks in: taking devices off for MRIs, replacing failed equipment, and navigating Medicare when it’s primary insurance can become a nightmare of paperwork and delays. And honestly, AI in some call centers has been pretty frustrating. Sometimes it feels like no one can answer a real-world question anymore. I think we should tread lightly and make sure technology actually makes life easier for people living with T1D — especially older adults who already manage enough complexity every day. Some days I think about a less stress free life and going back to a syringe and insulin. over 45 years of doing that, and now 25+ of devices, I'm tired of the challenges in getting replacements, and scar tissue, and mail order supplies and on and on.
    • 1 day, 4 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all technical advancements there are good things and bad things. The bad things (unforseen consequences) could be deadly like Hallucinations for the user, getting over doses of insulin. So, carefully thought out guard rails need to be developed and thoroughly tested. A good thing must be the accumulation of scenarios that KSannie mentioned. However it can not be completely autonomous. The current accuracy of Dex G7 and other sensors introduce error in to the calculations. This is similar to "self driving cars." The Robo taxi experiments have shown the unusual events that could become dangerous. Either audible situation commands or textual inputs like "goin to bed" or "driving" or "exercising" may be required at the beginning for a new user. As an example, after wearing my smart watch for a year now, it recognizes exercising without me having to tell it I'm exercising. This drives a more advanced and improved user interface. The other perceivable advantage might be accumulating changes over time, such as sicknesses, weight gain or loss, or changes in activity. Changes in food intake might be difficult to overcome. Something like "Under my Fork" app. Personally, I would like to see a reminder to bolis before eating! With all that said, we do we need all that? Probably not. Evolution of modified closed loop control may eliminate the need for AI control. The reality may be somewhere in-between the two.
    • 1 day, 4 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Sorry. I'm not sold on AI. I don't trust the people making it. There are too many reasons it could go wrong and be disasterous (just read the above comments). I'm not opposed to computers helping with things such as Control IQ, but when the computer starts doing the thinking, I think we've crossed the line. An aside: I've listened to AI music, and I think it sounds impersonal. It lacks a humanness. I don't find it pleasant to listen to. I've heard horror stories about AI being used by the military, with the end result being nuclear holocaust. I am a hard NO to AI. I gave it a "5".
    • 1 day, 5 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 1 day, 6 hours ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 1 day, 6 hours ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 1 day, 6 hours ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 1 day, 6 hours ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Sorry. I'm not sold on AI. I don't trust the people making it. There are too many reasons it could go wrong and be disasterous (just read the above comments). I'm not opposed to computers helping with things such as Control IQ, but when the computer starts doing the thinking, I think we've crossed the line. An aside: I've listened to AI music, and I think it sounds impersonal. It lacks a humanness. I don't find it pleasant to listen to. I've heard horror stories about AI being used by the military, with the end result being nuclear holocaust. I am a hard NO to AI. I gave it a "5".
    • 1 day, 6 hours ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    Clear All
Pages
    • T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
    • Articles
    • Community
      • About
      • Insights
      • T1D Screening
        • T1D Screening How-To
        • T1D Screening Results
        • T1D Screening Resources
      • Donate
      • Join the Community
    • Quality Improvement
      • About
      • Collaborative
        • Leadership
        • Committees
      • Centers
      • Meet the Experts
      • Learning Sessions
      • Resources
        • Change Packages
        • Sick Day Guide
        • FOH Screener
        • T1D Care Plans
      • Portal
      • Health Equity
        • Heal Advisors
    • Registry
      • About
      • Recruit for the Registry
    • Research
      • About
      • Publications
      • COVID-19 Research
      • Our Initiatives
    • Partnerships
      • About
      • Industry Partnerships
      • Academic Partnerships
      • Previous Work
    • About
      • Team
      • Board of Directors
      • Culture & Careers
      • Annual Report
    • Join / Login
    • Search
    • Donate

    On a scale of 1-5, how satisfied are you with your current insulin delivery method (pump, pens, syringes, inhaler, etc.)? 5 = the most satisfied, 1 = the least satisfied

    Home > LC Polls > On a scale of 1-5, how satisfied are you with your current insulin delivery method (pump, pens, syringes, inhaler, etc.)? 5 = the most satisfied, 1 = the least satisfied
    Previous

    If you are a U.S. citizen, have you ever served on a jury in a legal proceeding while living with T1D? If so, were accommodations made for you to have food/drink, carry any devices, etc.? Share your experience in the comments!

    Next

    If you wear an insulin pump, how many times has sweat caused your pump site to fall off early in the past month?

    Sarah Howard

    Sarah Howard has worked in the diabetes research field ever since she was diagnosed with T1D while in college in May 2013. Since then, she has worked for various diabetes organizations, focusing on research, advocacy, and community-building efforts for people with T1D and their loved ones. Sarah is currently the Senior Marketing Manager at T1D Exchange.

    Related Stories

    " At T1D Exchange, we’re proud to announce our Medical and Research Advisory Team — an accomplished group of leaders in endocrinology, research, and quality improvement. Together, they are redefining what’s possible in type 1 diabetes (T1D) care through rigorous data analysis, innovative research approaches, and real-world implementation. Their collective expertise is central to our mission of improving outcomes for all people living with T1D.  “We’re excited to be working with our advisors given their deep expertise across a broad range of areas in T1D,” said Dave Walton, CEO of T1D Exchange. “Their involvement magnifies our reach, knowledge, and impact. These advisors are shaping the future of diabetes care — driving innovation across research, clinical practice, and quality improvement.”    Meet the Medical & Research Advisory Team  The T1D Exchange Medical and Research Advisory Team brings together four leading endocrinologists, each offering a unique perspective and shared commitment to advancing T1D care:    Jenise Wong, MD, PhD Pediatric endocrinologist at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at the University of California, San Francisco Focus areas: Diabetes technology adoption and usability; health equity and access to care and technology; community-based and peer-support interventions; culturally responsive care          Jennifer Sherr, MD, PhD Pediatric endocrinologist at Yale Medicine and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut Focus areas: Clinical trials in diabetes technology (CGM and AID systems), disease-modifying treatments and immunotherapies, and emerging technologies and medications, including continuous ketone monitoring and nasal glucagon     Viral Shah, MD Adult endocrinologist at Indiana University Health and Professor of Medicine in the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism at Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis, Indiana Focus areas: Diabetes technology and adjunctive therapy trials; translational and data-driven research; T1D complications and bone health         Nestoras Mathioudakis, MD, MHS Adult endocrinologist at Johns Hopkins Medicine and Associate Professor of Medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland Focus areas: AI-driven clinical support tools; EMR-based data analytics for clinical decision making; data-driven quality improvement; health equity in T1D care        This accomplished team’s expertise spans adult and pediatric endocrinology, research, and quality improvement affiliated with leading institutions nationwide. Collectively, they have authored over 500 diabetes publications and secured research funding from organizations such as the National Institutes of Health, Helmsley Charitable Trust, the American Diabetes Association, and Breakthrough T1D — while remaining actively engaged in both clinical care and research.  “These individuals represent an impressive body of work while remaining deeply involved in the day-to-day realities of diabetes care,” said Walton. Their expertise covers the full spectrum of T1D care — from AI and predictive analytics to complication prevention, automated insulin delivery, continuous glucose and ketone monitoring, GLP-1 treatments, health equity, mental health, autoantibody screening, and disease prevention.    Turning insight into impact  The team’s work goes beyond research, focusing on translating insights into real-world practice. By leveraging data to scale best practices, the goal is to drive meaningful, measurable change across clinics and communities.  “Our advisors will help to extend our impact — whether through QI strategy, research innovation, funding opportunities, or new data-driven solutions,” said Walton. “We want to take what’s working at individual centers and spread that as broadly as possible.”   He added, “As a Collaborative, we’re also focused on advanced population health strategies such as exploring predictive data models to identify risks earlier and intervene before complications even begin to happen.”    The power of the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative  Central to this work is the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative (T1DX-QI) — a nationwide network of clinics working together to improve care through shared data, benchmarking, and evidence-based practices.  “I’m thrilled to serve as a Medical Advisor for T1D Exchange, because I’ve seen firsthand the impact this network can have on patient care,” said Dr. Nestoras Mathioudakis. “T1D Exchange is the premier organization for quality improvement in type 1 diabetes, with unparalleled assets like a large EHR database and robust patient registry.”  He added that he is excited to apply his expertise in EHR research and big data analytics to generate real-world evidence across diagnosis, management, and outcomes.  Dr. Viral Shah echoed that perspective, reflecting on T1DX-QI's evolution: “I have been involved with T1D Exchange since its early days and have had the privilege of witnessing how it has transformed the quality of diabetes care across the United States. I’m delighted to return as a Medical Advisor.”  He emphasized the importance of accelerating impact. “I look forward to working closely with the team to accelerate the evidence generation and to help translate these insights to improve patient care.”   Dr. Jenise Wong highlighted the visible impact of T1DX-QI on the delivery of care. "I’m truly honored and grateful to be working with T1D Exchange as a Medical Advisor. T1DX-QI is a remarkable resource for centers that are using continuous process improvement to improve the quality of care for people living with diabetes.”  “Diabetes centers working with T1DX –QI have done amazing work using QI methodology to make care accessible and equitable for all people with diabetes,” she said. “It’s inspiring to be a part of a collaborative in which centers have been creative and thoughtful with initiatives to address individual and systemic challenges to care, improving clinical outcomes as well as the patient experience."  Looking ahead, Dr. Sherr highlighted the opportunity to build on the existing strong foundation. “I’m very excited to be working as a Medical Advisor for T1D Exchange,” she said. “It’s a privilege to help shape what comes next for a group that’s already doing such impactful work.”  “Sharing what’s happening in clinical practice, benchmarking across centers, and understanding outcomes is how we figure out what’s working, what’s not, and where we go next,” she said.      The future of T1D care   With this team’s vision and expertise, T1D Exchange is positioned to accelerate progress in T1D care — bridging research and real-world practice to drive meaningful, measurable impact.  Together, we look forward to advancing innovation and improving outcomes for everyone affected by type 1 diabetes.   "

    3 days ago  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Improving Diabetes Care Through Precision Medicine 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 week ago 8 min read  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Bridging Research, Technology, and Real-World Care 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 week ago 9 min read  
    Insulin & Meds

    Ask the Expert: Diana Isaacs on Benefits, Risks, and Real-World Use of GLP-1s in T1D 

    Jewels Doskicz, 2 weeks ago 6 min read  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Advancing Equity, Improving Outcomes, and Reducing the Burden of T1D 

    Jewels Doskicz, 4 weeks ago 8 min read  
    Our team

    Spotlight on T1DX-QI: Clinical Leadership Committee 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 month ago 6 min read  

    49 Comments

    1. LizB

      Love my pump and would hate if I had to go back to injections.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    2. Patricia Dalrymple

      Love my pump but I need a CGM. My A1C is great but my TIR needs to improve and I need the CGM for that. I am resisting because the last time I tried one probably 8 years ago, it hurt to put it in, I didn’t like all the tape, it continues to beep AFTER you correct, just a lot of excuses. I retire in 2 years and then I will have time to deal with it.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Bonnie Lundblom

        Hi Patricia, I wanted to let you know that the Dexcom CGM6 system compared to both their CGM 4 and 5 is almost pain free. I was totally amazed the 1st time I placed my CGM 6 sensor at the difference so I’d encourage you to try it again.

        1
        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    3. CandyM

      Love, love, LOVE my Omnipod! I used MDI for the first 47 years of being T1. I was not interested in a tubed pump. The Omnipod had improved my control and is really easy to wear and use.

      4
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Sherolyn Newell

        That’s what I use as well. It’s great and the phone support people are always extremely helpful and friendly. I like your dog, I have a couple of wolfhounds.

        5 years ago Log in to Reply
      2. Teri Morris

        How long did you have to wait for it once you asked your endo to get you on it?

        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    4. Don (Lucky) Copps

      Using Tandem X2 w Dexcom g6.

      Readings every five minutes is awesome. Maintaining the system is time consuming, you’re actually trading the time of pricking your finger and exchanging it with constant site changes. Every three days for the infusion set, cannula etc. every 10 days for the G6 sensor and every 90 days for the G6 transmitter. it’s an awful lot of Mickey Mouse. in exchange you get better A1 C’s and overall control. I don’t think the G7 is going to do much for lack of hassle on the users part. I don’t see where time-saving will happen for the user. Maybe I’m missing something? However, knowing where your BS is 24/7 is so worthwhile! I think I could live without the pump using Lantas & Aspart/Novolog, but losing Dexcom would be a disaster.

      3
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Henry Renn

        Don, Totally agree. Details can become frustrating. Add to them failed cannula placements & my particular need to change site every other day. In previous 15 years with 3 different pumps I rarely had problems with cannulas. Seems to be regular occurrence with Tandem infusion sets. Too many steps with so many things that can go wrong.

        2
        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    5. Henry Renn

      70 yr old, 65 T1, brittle diabetic. 48 yrs of injections, 17 yrs pump user. Currently wear the Tandem t:slim x2. Any of my pumps have been better than taking 5 injections per day(4 Humalog, 1 Lantus). Control has been best with Tandem t:slim used with Dexcom G6. My dissatisfaction is with time novolog takes to bring bg down after meals. My caregiver & I have tried many strategies & adjustments to basal rates, carb ratio & bolus rates but have yet to find the right combo. My time in range is great but wish I didn’t temporarily go above range after meals.

      7
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Rick Martin

        I agree with you, Henry. I’m 66, 55 years T1, was on the pump for 10 years, then on inhaled insulin for 3. Those three years were the best ever and the control was the best too. I’m now on the Tandem T-Slim pump and my control is much worse. I wish I could go back on inhaled insulin – we’re still fighting with Medicare to cover it otherwise it’s completely unaffordable and I’ll continue on the pump with higher A1c numbers and all.

        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    6. GLORIA MILLER

      I also would hate to return to injections. I’ve been on a pump since the early 1990s and Libre CGM since it came out in the US – 2017, I think. I wish the Libre and Omnipod communicated with each other like the T-Slim and Dexcom does though.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    7. Dave Barden

      What I don’t like about my pump,
      Medtronic 630, is throwing out 20+ units of insulin with every reservoir change. I stopped doing that by refilling the old reservoir and using it till the markings wear off.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    8. Ken Raiche

      I’ve got to admit the changes that have occurred over the last couple of years have made my life on a pump worth while. I rated it at 5 in comparison to MDI although I still feel that there’s room for improvement. Improvements are more geared towards CGM and the warmup as well sensor issues. As for the pump the one notable thing which is the appendage/tethering aspects although Omnipod is coming along with systems that approach those of the tandem. I’m counting down the days when these improves are implemented.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    9. Meghan Larson

      I am very satisfied. I currently use a pump and would have rated it a 5 but, I had a bad day yesterday with my infusion site. The issues with the materials are so frustrating, but overall, pump therapy has been WAY better than injections.

      4
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    10. Tina Roberts

      I like having a pump. However, I wish it were water proof for swimming.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    11. kristina blake

      I am currently using the Tandem TSlimX2, Dexcom 6 and the BIQ software. BIQ allows me to avoid the lows, and Dexcom G6 allows me to micro-dose so my time in range is about 95%. T1D for 40 years, pumping since early 2000’s and Dexcom-ing since they first got on the scene. Because I like to be in the driver’s seat in my D mgt, I will not switch to CIQ (target is too high, no temp basal options etc). So I rated things 5.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    12. Carol Meares

      I use tslim x2 CiQ. I am very unhappy with not being able to set my target at 100. In all my years I have always set my target at 100. Now I spend a lot of days in roller coasters because I try to trick the algorithm to go lower and it is always stopping my basal. I should have stayed with Basal iq and it really upsets me that they won’t let me change back to that delivery system. I am considering changing to Omnipod as soon as my warranty is up on this pump which I think is about another year. I have been able to keep my a1c at a similar rate but I am getting less stable lines and more lows.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    13. Ernie Richmann

      I have the t slim pump and Dexcom G6. I rated 4 only because I lose communication often with the Tandem software. I use the tandem app as well as the dexcom app so I have access to the Clarity information. I sometimes have problems with infusion sets and sensor errors/failures.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    14. Tb-well

      I have used both the Minimed and the tandem pumps. In my experience the Minimed pump is superior. With the advent of the 670 and the 770, the multitude of flaws with the Minimed CGM have become frighteningly apparent. Though Minimed makes a superior pump, in the future I will be switching, due to the fact that there sensor is so bad that it actively and routinely puts me at risk. In the CGM forum when your BG matches the pumps readout, they call it a unicorn due to how rare it is. With the dexcom CGM it was a LOT more normal. If the sensor is bad, it defeats the purpose of even having a closed loop system.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. TEH

        I totally agree. Love the pump but had a lot of problems with the sensor, typically 20%, one sensor per box.

        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    15. Mary Dexter

      I prefer my pens to any pump. Used a Medtronic pump for several years and would never do it again. I like knowing I get the amount of insulin I dialed. Too many bubbles and highs with the pump.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    16. cynthia jaworski

      i have no issues with MDI. Especially since needles are so slim and sharp these days. No issues of placement, changing sites, etc. Also, I love my libre cgm.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    17. connie ker

      I have used the same method for the past 23 years of MDI, and am a 14 day Freestyle Libre senior with LADA. So I have nothing to compare other than my fingers thanking me everyday for not sticking them.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    18. Mick Martin

      Wow! It appears that finally I’m being allowed to comment again. I don’t know what’s happened, but thank you for ‘updating’ your website.

      I’m pretty satisfied with my Medtronic 670G, though I do experience more ‘problems’ with the Guardian 3 Sensors that I use for CGM than I SHOULD. (‘Problems’ such as sensors detaching from my body. I do, however, perspire quite a lot, and it’s particularly the case when I exercise. The sensors rarely last the 7 days that they’re supposed to.)

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    19. Dave Akers

      Thank goodness! Finally Inhaled is included! Hope more folks get on this bandwagon. I’m T1D for 18yrs…never thought a Fixed dose insulin would work, AND IT DOES!!!! If you’ve never tried it and don’t think it’s for you… Ive been there!! Get some experience and please reach out to me if you have questions! Most docs won’t understand this product yet unfortunately… if they deter you from it, it’s due to them not having patients on it and not understanding it. PERIOD.

      Best control ive ever had! Always maintained a good A1c (-6.7%) but my variability is significantly less… tighter standard deviations.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    20. Anita Galliher

      I use an Omnipod and Dexcom G6 and it’s the best combination I’ve tried. I had an Animas pump with attached Dexcom which was extremely convenient except for having tubing. I detested being tethered to that thing all the time and having to remove it when I showered or swam. I was delighted when Animas decided to stop making pumps! I had been on the Omnipod previously but couldn’t afford to stay on it when insurance decided not to pay anymore. Thus the Animas. But when they disbanded, Medicare blessedly picked up the Tab for the Omnipod, and later on, the Dexcom (or possibly vice versa – both in a relatively short period of time.) I rated my combination 4 rather than 5 because of the inordinate time it requires. It seems I’m always having to stop and do something, especially when my husband is waiting on me. I hate having to carry around so many devices and having so many things stuck in me. I guess what it really comes down to is, I just hate diabetes. After 58 years with it, I’m burned out with no hope of a cure. When I was diagnosed in 1963, my doctor told me a cure was just around the corner. I’ve been waiting for somebody to round that corner for decades. I’m grateful for the advances, but instead of better technology, I’d rather have a cure. It’s like they’d rather spend money on making it easier and more accurate rather than gone. I vote for gone. Sorry for the vitriolic diatribe. Sometimes I just need to vent!

      3
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Joan Fray

        I’m in exactly the same boat, except 1962. I so agree with you! Tired of it, just so tired…..But what can we do? One day at a time, so they say…….

        1
        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    21. betsy valian

      I haven’t been offered the option of inhalable insulin?

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    22. Joan Fray

      59 years T1d. It’s a very profitable disease for the medical establishment. They don’t want a cure. They want to improve expensive technology instead. More profits.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Teri Morris

        I agree Joan. We are cash cows for big pharma.

        1
        5 years ago Log in to Reply
      2. Jneticdiabetic

        Don’t give up hope! I work at a non-profit diabetes research center with a mission to cure T1D.
        Some of the scientists and physicians I work with have dedicated their careers, and in some cases their lives, to trying to eradicate T1D. I know it’s frustrating that it’s taking so long. I don’t believe there’s a lack of good intention but progress is slowed because T1D is so very complicated and funding outside of industry can be very hard to secure.

        1
        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    23. George Lovelace

      My Response was 5 but it should be a 9 because Tandem CIQ and Dexcom G6 is as close to Perfect as well the year before I was Dxed. It isn’t perfect but nothing is, not even a Pancreas Transplant.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    24. keith johnson

      So I would give it a 5 but the inability to customize pump alarms is maddening!! I have “alarm fatigue” that has resulted in less blood sugar control. I take responsibility but I wish pump designers understood how much alarm fatigue effects some peoples ability to use this technology more efficiently.

      3
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    25. Bonnie Lundblom

      Tandem Tslimx2 pump is user friendly, easy to operate and to review data and doses administered. My only wish is that Medicare would cover a tubeless pump.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    26. Daniel Smith

      Since starting the omnipod, it has greatly reduced my stress and improved control. I am very satisfied and looking forward to their algorithm to further improve my over night ranges.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    27. Molly Jones

      My insulin delivery method has definitely improved over the years. I am happy with it, but in an alternate reality without business and patents involved it could be so much better: conglomerate all the companies and pick and choose the features you desire.
      Omnipod I liked the best, as it had no tubes, but it could not deliver the small amounts of insulin I needed.
      Dexcom paired with Tandem and it’s control IQ over my insulin delivery is relatively good, but I wish it could understand short rebound highs and not give corrections when these occur.
      Tandem is a bother to load compared to Medtronic pumps or Omnipod, but compared to what I first used: two different insulins, this is good.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    28. Patricia Maddix

      I selected 4 as I get really good control with my pump. I have an old Medtronic 723 pump but would dearly love to have the tandem with CIQ but due to my vision loss cannot safely or consistently use the touchscreen. I would just have to rely on my husband way too often. I know you can take a bolus/correction by pressing the external button which gives audible feedback but my understanding is the tandem pump does not measure in increments smaller than 0.5 units and I require the ability to measure in 0.1 units. I would only trust Dexcom as a component of any hybrid closed loop system so at this point it leaves out Medtronic. I have to still use my Medtronic pump which measures and 0.1 unit increments in manual mode and do all the calculations myself. This is not ideal but with great effort every day I get excellent control.
      I know there are pumps in development that can be controlled from a smart phone through an app and I am waiting for this to become available as my iPhone has speech capabilities.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    29. Sue Martin

      I used pens, which I like a lot for their convenience, but get tired of all the injections everyday.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    30. M C

      It’s hard to attach the pump anywhere else than the abdomen – After ‘x’ number of years – the scarring continues to build – It would be great if an alternate way of delivering the insulin with the pump, allowing us to change up locations on the body, would be fantastic. As the scar tissue builds, the effectiveness diminishes. Still – Hands down, for me, the pump has given me far superior control vs the pens/syringes.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    31. Teri Morris

      I have used syringes/pens since diagnosis in 1979. Tried to switch to a pump 2 years ago but too many hoops to discourage me from proceeding with it after covid put it off for more than 6 months.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    32. Jneticdiabetic

      I put 4. I’m very grateful for the insulin and device improvements made during my 25 yrs with T1D. Left 1 point for continued improvement. E.g., improved algorithms for CGM alarms so I’m less tempted to take technology breaks, improved automation around meal bolusing, etc.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    33. Nicholas Argento

      t-slim with Control IQ, I gave it a 5, I love it but it is not perfect and could use some refinements like allowing a scheduled exercise mode, timing exercise mode when it is set manually, and allowing a delayed bolus to be given rather than square wave, but 4 wasn’t strong enough for how much it has helped me overall….

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    34. Beth Franz

      I put 4. I do syringes with pens to get more precise dosing (half units). I do reuse the syringes and with using a pen sitting in room temperature – have had no issues with insulin going bad. And insulin lasts a lot longer than manufacturers dates state.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. T1DGJ

        I do this too, syringe from pen. I found a Lantus pen in a bag at room temp for many months. I tried it expecting to cover highs all day. Nope! It’s working GREAT! And definitely also have found expiration date to be almost worthless, my refrigerated Humalog and Lantus both work fine past date. I sometimes don’t use all the Humalog because I but many at a time outside the USA for great pricing.

        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    35. TBISHOP95

      I chose three. Currently I use the Omnipod and the major reason why I prefer it over other pumps is the lack of tubing, however the adhesive causes me a lot of skin irritation as I believe I am allergic to the adhesive with no relief from methods referred to me by my doctor. I also find that the absorption in areas other than my abdomen are poor.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Abraham Remson

        I feel a kinship with what you wrote. I also use the omnipod for the same reason. I started out with the medtronic and found the tubing would catch on almost everything. I just want to mention the IV3000. I found less irritation when I used that. I also found that the irritation only in specific spots. other places where not so sensitive

        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    36. Magnus Hiis

      I use a DIY system called FreeAPS a fork from Loop (Dexcom G6, Omnipod Eros, IPhone and Fiasp) it’s good and the best thing that happened yet.
      But it can also get better, a better algorithm, a much faster insulin, a smaller pump and sensor.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    37. Cheryl Seibert

      Overall, I gave my insulin pump a “4”. After 5 shots a day, I never want to go back to injections. I love the ability to know my glucose levels 24/7 via the CGM. Insulin delivery algorithms, storage method and infusion set design still need a lot of improvement(thus the ‘4’).

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    38. MikeeB.

      Been using an Insulin pump for 37 years and on a CGMS for (Medtronic/Dex) over 10 years.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply

    On a scale of 1-5, how satisfied are you with your current insulin delivery method (pump, pens, syringes, inhaler, etc.)? 5 = the most satisfied, 1 = the least satisfied Cancel reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.




    101 Federal Street, Suite 440
    Boston, MA 02110
    Phone: 617-892-6100
    Email: admin@t1dexchange.org

    Privacy Policy

    Terms of Use

    Follow Us

    • facebook
    • twitter
    • linkedin
    • instagram

    © 2024 T1D Exchange.
    All Rights Reserved.

    © 2023 T1D Exchange. All Rights Reserved.
    • Login
    • Register

    Forgot Password

    Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

    Skip Next Finish

    Account successfully created.

    Please check your inbox and verify your email in the next 24 hours.

    Your Account Type

    Please select all that apply.

    I have type 1 diabetes

    I'm a parent/guardian of a person with type 1 diabetes

    I'm interested in the diabetes community or industry

    Select Topics

    We will customize your stories feed based on what you select here.

    [userselectcat]

    We're preparing your personalized page.

    This will only take a second...

    Search and filter

    [searchandfilter slug="sort-filter-post"]