Subscribe Now

[hb-subscribe]

Trending News

T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
  • Activity
    • 15 hours, 11 minutes ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all technical advancements there are good things and bad things. The bad things (unforseen consequences) could be deadly like Hallucinations for the user, getting over doses of insulin. So, carefully thought out guard rails need to be developed and thoroughly tested. A good thing must be the accumulation of scenarios that KSannie mentioned. However it can not be completely autonomous. The current accuracy of Dex G7 and other sensors introduce error in to the calculations. This is similar to "self driving cars." The Robo taxi experiments have shown the unusual events that could become dangerous. Either audible situation commands or textual inputs like "goin to bed" or "driving" or "exercising" may be required at the beginning for a new user. As an example, after wearing my smart watch for a year now, it recognizes exercising without me having to tell it I'm exercising. This drives a more advanced and improved user interface. The other perceivable advantage might be accumulating changes over time, such as sicknesses, weight gain or loss, or changes in activity. Changes in food intake might be difficult to overcome. Something like "Under my Fork" app. Personally, I would like to see a reminder to bolis before eating! With all that said, we do we need all that? Probably not. Evolution of modified closed loop control may eliminate the need for AI control. The reality may be somewhere in-between the two.
    • 15 hours, 12 minutes ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 15 hours, 12 minutes ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 15 hours, 13 minutes ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I’m uncomfortable not knowing when and when it isn’t being used, but I’m not sure why really. A “singer” named Benny Rivers popped up in one of my feeds. I really liked the music, until I found out it was a total AI fabrication. Then I was uncomfortable. Why? I felt “taken”, like someone pulled a fast one on me, pulled the wool over my eyes. I liked the music less then. I didn’t like that I couldn’t find a tour date, things like that. But I was most uncomfortable not truly understanding why it made me uncomfortable. The music was still enjoyable.
    • 16 hours, 48 minutes ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Having recently dealt with ongoing tech issues involving our heat and electrical-use notifications for more than six months — and it’s still not fully resolved — I’m not always a fan of too much technology. That said, I am interested in advances like the Twist Insulin Pump potentially detecting scar tissue or helping with infusion-site issues. But then reality kicks in: taking devices off for MRIs, replacing failed equipment, and navigating Medicare when it’s primary insurance can become a nightmare of paperwork and delays. And honestly, AI in some call centers has been pretty frustrating. Sometimes it feels like no one can answer a real-world question anymore. I think we should tread lightly and make sure technology actually makes life easier for people living with T1D — especially older adults who already manage enough complexity every day. Some days I think about a less stress free life and going back to a syringe and insulin. over 45 years of doing that, and now 25+ of devices, I'm tired of the challenges in getting replacements, and scar tissue, and mail order supplies and on and on.
    • 16 hours, 49 minutes ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all technical advancements there are good things and bad things. The bad things (unforseen consequences) could be deadly like Hallucinations for the user, getting over doses of insulin. So, carefully thought out guard rails need to be developed and thoroughly tested. A good thing must be the accumulation of scenarios that KSannie mentioned. However it can not be completely autonomous. The current accuracy of Dex G7 and other sensors introduce error in to the calculations. This is similar to "self driving cars." The Robo taxi experiments have shown the unusual events that could become dangerous. Either audible situation commands or textual inputs like "goin to bed" or "driving" or "exercising" may be required at the beginning for a new user. As an example, after wearing my smart watch for a year now, it recognizes exercising without me having to tell it I'm exercising. This drives a more advanced and improved user interface. The other perceivable advantage might be accumulating changes over time, such as sicknesses, weight gain or loss, or changes in activity. Changes in food intake might be difficult to overcome. Something like "Under my Fork" app. Personally, I would like to see a reminder to bolis before eating! With all that said, we do we need all that? Probably not. Evolution of modified closed loop control may eliminate the need for AI control. The reality may be somewhere in-between the two.
    • 16 hours, 50 minutes ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Sorry. I'm not sold on AI. I don't trust the people making it. There are too many reasons it could go wrong and be disasterous (just read the above comments). I'm not opposed to computers helping with things such as Control IQ, but when the computer starts doing the thinking, I think we've crossed the line. An aside: I've listened to AI music, and I think it sounds impersonal. It lacks a humanness. I don't find it pleasant to listen to. I've heard horror stories about AI being used by the military, with the end result being nuclear holocaust. I am a hard NO to AI. I gave it a "5".
    • 16 hours, 53 minutes ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 17 hours, 58 minutes ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 17 hours, 59 minutes ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 17 hours, 59 minutes ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 18 hours, 36 minutes ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Sorry. I'm not sold on AI. I don't trust the people making it. There are too many reasons it could go wrong and be disasterous (just read the above comments). I'm not opposed to computers helping with things such as Control IQ, but when the computer starts doing the thinking, I think we've crossed the line. An aside: I've listened to AI music, and I think it sounds impersonal. It lacks a humanness. I don't find it pleasant to listen to. I've heard horror stories about AI being used by the military, with the end result being nuclear holocaust. I am a hard NO to AI. I gave it a "5".
    • 18 hours, 37 minutes ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 18 hours, 40 minutes ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 18 hours, 40 minutes ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 18 hours, 42 minutes ago
      Mike S likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 19 hours, 4 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      Do you have a management plan if you test positive for ketones? Please share more in the comments.
      Sure, if you can call it a plan to flush with liquids and take electrolytes and insulin as needed.
    • 19 hours, 5 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      Do you have a management plan if you test positive for ketones? Please share more in the comments.
      Inject. Inject. Inject. All other considerations are secondary, tertiary, or way down the list. Why would anyone ever rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic? Might as well strike up the band to play Nearer My God to Thee!. ☹
    • 19 hours, 6 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 19 hours, 6 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      Do you have a management plan if you test positive for ketones? Please share more in the comments.
      It would depend on the symptoms and vary.
    • 19 hours, 7 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 19 hours, 8 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 19 hours, 8 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      2 It already is. But needs to be checked occasionally. I don't want a person inside me every five minutes.
    • 19 hours, 11 minutes ago
      KCR likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 19 hours, 17 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    Clear All
Pages
    • T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
    • Articles
    • Community
      • About
      • Insights
      • T1D Screening
        • T1D Screening How-To
        • T1D Screening Results
        • T1D Screening Resources
      • Donate
      • Join the Community
    • Quality Improvement
      • About
      • Collaborative
        • Leadership
        • Committees
      • Centers
      • Meet the Experts
      • Learning Sessions
      • Resources
        • Change Packages
        • Sick Day Guide
        • FOH Screener
        • T1D Care Plans
      • Portal
      • Health Equity
        • Heal Advisors
    • Registry
      • About
      • Recruit for the Registry
    • Research
      • About
      • Publications
      • COVID-19 Research
      • Our Initiatives
    • Partnerships
      • About
      • Industry Partnerships
      • Academic Partnerships
      • Previous Work
    • About
      • Team
      • Board of Directors
      • Culture & Careers
      • Annual Report
    • Join / Login
    • Search
    • Donate

    If you wear a CGM that does not require regular calibrations, on average, how often do you choose to calibrate your CGM with a blood glucose meter reading?

    Home > LC Polls > If you wear a CGM that does not require regular calibrations, on average, how often do you choose to calibrate your CGM with a blood glucose meter reading?
    Previous

    Has your health care provider recommended taking a statin because of diabetes, regardless of your cholesterol levels?

    Next

    If you wear an insulin pump, what do you do with it when going through airport security?

    Sarah Howard

    Sarah Howard has worked in the diabetes research field ever since she was diagnosed with T1D while in college in May 2013. Since then, she has worked for various diabetes organizations, focusing on research, advocacy, and community-building efforts for people with T1D and their loved ones. Sarah is currently the Senior Marketing Manager at T1D Exchange.

    Related Stories

    " At T1D Exchange, we’re proud to announce our Medical and Research Advisory Team — an accomplished group of leaders in endocrinology, research, and quality improvement. Together, they are redefining what’s possible in type 1 diabetes (T1D) care through rigorous data analysis, innovative research approaches, and real-world implementation. Their collective expertise is central to our mission of improving outcomes for all people living with T1D.  “We’re excited to be working with our advisors given their deep expertise across a broad range of areas in T1D,” said Dave Walton, CEO of T1D Exchange. “Their involvement magnifies our reach, knowledge, and impact. These advisors are shaping the future of diabetes care — driving innovation across research, clinical practice, and quality improvement.”    Meet the Medical & Research Advisory Team  The T1D Exchange Medical and Research Advisory Team brings together four leading endocrinologists, each offering a unique perspective and shared commitment to advancing T1D care:    Jenise Wong, MD, PhD Pediatric endocrinologist at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at the University of California, San Francisco Focus areas: Diabetes technology adoption and usability; health equity and access to care and technology; community-based and peer-support interventions; culturally responsive care          Jennifer Sherr, MD, PhD Pediatric endocrinologist at Yale Medicine and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut Focus areas: Clinical trials in diabetes technology (CGM and AID systems), disease-modifying treatments and immunotherapies, and emerging technologies and medications, including continuous ketone monitoring and nasal glucagon     Viral Shah, MD Adult endocrinologist at Indiana University Health and Professor of Medicine in the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism at Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis, Indiana Focus areas: Diabetes technology and adjunctive therapy trials; translational and data-driven research; T1D complications and bone health         Nestoras Mathioudakis, MD, MHS Adult endocrinologist at Johns Hopkins Medicine and Associate Professor of Medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland Focus areas: AI-driven clinical support tools; EMR-based data analytics for clinical decision making; data-driven quality improvement; health equity in T1D care        This accomplished team’s expertise spans adult and pediatric endocrinology, research, and quality improvement affiliated with leading institutions nationwide. Collectively, they have authored over 500 diabetes publications and secured research funding from organizations such as the National Institutes of Health, Helmsley Charitable Trust, the American Diabetes Association, and Breakthrough T1D — while remaining actively engaged in both clinical care and research.  “These individuals represent an impressive body of work while remaining deeply involved in the day-to-day realities of diabetes care,” said Walton. Their expertise covers the full spectrum of T1D care — from AI and predictive analytics to complication prevention, automated insulin delivery, continuous glucose and ketone monitoring, GLP-1 treatments, health equity, mental health, autoantibody screening, and disease prevention.    Turning insight into impact  The team’s work goes beyond research, focusing on translating insights into real-world practice. By leveraging data to scale best practices, the goal is to drive meaningful, measurable change across clinics and communities.  “Our advisors will help to extend our impact — whether through QI strategy, research innovation, funding opportunities, or new data-driven solutions,” said Walton. “We want to take what’s working at individual centers and spread that as broadly as possible.”   He added, “As a Collaborative, we’re also focused on advanced population health strategies such as exploring predictive data models to identify risks earlier and intervene before complications even begin to happen.”    The power of the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative  Central to this work is the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative (T1DX-QI) — a nationwide network of clinics working together to improve care through shared data, benchmarking, and evidence-based practices.  “I’m thrilled to serve as a Medical Advisor for T1D Exchange, because I’ve seen firsthand the impact this network can have on patient care,” said Dr. Nestoras Mathioudakis. “T1D Exchange is the premier organization for quality improvement in type 1 diabetes, with unparalleled assets like a large EHR database and robust patient registry.”  He added that he is excited to apply his expertise in EHR research and big data analytics to generate real-world evidence across diagnosis, management, and outcomes.  Dr. Viral Shah echoed that perspective, reflecting on T1DX-QI's evolution: “I have been involved with T1D Exchange since its early days and have had the privilege of witnessing how it has transformed the quality of diabetes care across the United States. I’m delighted to return as a Medical Advisor.”  He emphasized the importance of accelerating impact. “I look forward to working closely with the team to accelerate the evidence generation and to help translate these insights to improve patient care.”   Dr. Jenise Wong highlighted the visible impact of T1DX-QI on the delivery of care. "I’m truly honored and grateful to be working with T1D Exchange as a Medical Advisor. T1DX-QI is a remarkable resource for centers that are using continuous process improvement to improve the quality of care for people living with diabetes.”  “Diabetes centers working with T1DX –QI have done amazing work using QI methodology to make care accessible and equitable for all people with diabetes,” she said. “It’s inspiring to be a part of a collaborative in which centers have been creative and thoughtful with initiatives to address individual and systemic challenges to care, improving clinical outcomes as well as the patient experience."  Looking ahead, Dr. Sherr highlighted the opportunity to build on the existing strong foundation. “I’m very excited to be working as a Medical Advisor for T1D Exchange,” she said. “It’s a privilege to help shape what comes next for a group that’s already doing such impactful work.”  “Sharing what’s happening in clinical practice, benchmarking across centers, and understanding outcomes is how we figure out what’s working, what’s not, and where we go next,” she said.      The future of T1D care   With this team’s vision and expertise, T1D Exchange is positioned to accelerate progress in T1D care — bridging research and real-world practice to drive meaningful, measurable impact.  Together, we look forward to advancing innovation and improving outcomes for everyone affected by type 1 diabetes.   "

    3 days ago  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Improving Diabetes Care Through Precision Medicine 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 week ago 8 min read  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Bridging Research, Technology, and Real-World Care 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 week ago 9 min read  
    Insulin & Meds

    Ask the Expert: Diana Isaacs on Benefits, Risks, and Real-World Use of GLP-1s in T1D 

    Jewels Doskicz, 2 weeks ago 6 min read  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Advancing Equity, Improving Outcomes, and Reducing the Burden of T1D 

    Jewels Doskicz, 4 weeks ago 8 min read  
    Our team

    Spotlight on T1DX-QI: Clinical Leadership Committee 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 month ago 6 min read  

    47 Comments

    1. Bridget Riegsecker

      Never.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    2. PamK

      I do check my blood sugar with a meter once in a while, but I don’t enter the number (IE: calibrate) unless there is a large discrepancy.

      3
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    3. gary rind

      Can’t calibrate a Libre2. Doing more fingersticks than I’d ever imagined. Not pleased.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    4. Rob Smith

      Hardly ever first 10 days (G6). 2 or 3 times after restarting typically.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Gerald Oefelein

        How do you restart? How long will the restarted sensor work?

        5 years ago Log in to Reply
      2. Karen Brady

        Rob, do you find it’s less accurate after restarting? I never check with a finger stick so I can’t say, but I thought the consensus in the DOC was that the longer a sensor is in, the more accurate it is…

        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    5. Lakesha McDonald Kee

      Never, The elimination of finger pricks after 36 years is a game changer!

      4
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    6. Retired and glad

      With G6 I used to do it every night, but it’s so highly accurate I gave that up. Typically I do it after starting a new sensor but that’s about it.

      3
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    7. Tom Caesar

      Even with D6 must check especially the first 24 hours with a new sensor. After that only if numbers don’t seem correct. Such a relief not finger poking multiple times a day, my fingers love it! Looking forward to the D7…

      3
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    8. Natalie Daley

      The Libre 2 has been perfectly accurate since I started using this CGM three months ago. The callouses on the sides of my fingers have healed, and I don’t have to get blood from a stone. Cold hands don’t test well.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    9. connie ker

      I notice that the Abbott Freestyle 14 day Libre doesn’t last 14 days for me. The readings after day 10-14 start running too low, so I just change early. Often I see blood on the insertion which is the cause.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    10. BOB FISK

      I use Dexcom, so the session lasts 10 days. Typically, I will calibrate several times at the beginning of a session, then every couple of days. If I sense an issue–such as feeling signs of hypoglycemia when the CGM indicates a higher BG level, I will calibrate then. I will do the same for the other BG extreme. If I do a calibration at these extremes, I will check that calibration as well, usually several hours later.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    11. Denise Lyons

      The first 24 hours for g6 can be less accurate so I allow for that. Outside of that, I occasionally check but I don’t calibrate unless the numbers aren’t accurate. I do use the glucose meter control solutions to confirm the meter number but both instruments have inherent variability so I expect them to be comparable but not the same.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    12. Amanda Barras

      1-2 times in first 12 hours and a spot check towards the end. At the 8-9 day range.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    13. George Lovelace

      Dex G6 – hardly ever. At Startup or maybe when I change Xmiters. It can be Months

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    14. Joan McGinnis

      I chck bl sugar by meter every nite and if not the same or close i calibrate. Otherwise I ck blood sugar if low to see if comparable

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    15. Nevin Bowman

      I usually need to calibrate 2-3 times at startup. After that, it is usually more accurate.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    16. dave hedeen

      Where 2 CGM, calibrate when CGM variance exceeds 20 percent

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    17. Ceara Glasgow

      I might be wrong but I read somewhere that collaborating actually makes your readings less accurate if you do that when you don’t need to… I don’t know my endocrinologist is proud of my A-1 C. So I just kind of move along With my dead pancreas And try to stay mindful of how I treat my body but I definitely don’t stress my health too much anymore it just becomes an obsession if I’m too focused

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Karen Brady

        I’ve heard the same thing – that calibrations can do more harm than good.

        1
        5 years ago Log in to Reply
      2. AnitaS

        I was told by my Tandem pump instructor that calibrating the dexcom makes the sensor less accurate.

        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    18. Don P

      not all CGM’s require calibration …… this should have been an option above.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Sahran Holiday

        Dexcom G6 says it does not require calibration. Still must finger stick many times per day. If the meter and the Dexcom reading are not close do two or more finger sticks and calibrate if necessary to keep in line. The meter can be wrong too. At times the Dexcom rejects the calibration and I have to wait.

        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    19. Thomas Cline

      The Dexcom G6 advertises as if it rarely would need calibration, but in fact I have to routinely calibrate it every few days to get it to be within even 10% of my blood glucose meter (one-touch), especially nearer the beginning of a run. I always take two meter readings then force that calibration on the Dexcom by double entering. The frustrating thing is that the G6 tends to get better over time (the first day is the worst) and about the time that I am forced to discard the sensor (since Dexcom has designed it to be impossible to extend — even if it can work perfectly — how shameful; pure greed) it seems to work most reliably. What really bothers me about the G6 is the amount of plastic waste it generates. While the G6 applicator is convenient and less “painful” (“” because the pain with the G5 was always trivial), in my experience it tends to cause bleeding far more frequently than the G5. But the G5 had an order of magnitude less plastic waste, and I was able to get two weeks from every sensor.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    20. Carol Meares

      Sometimes I will have a Dexcom insertion that reads quite differently from my meter and I spend few days calibrating. After that it settles in and works mostly without extra calibration. Lately I have had really good sessions requiring no calibrations. I had one dex replaced this year as it kept waking me up with very wrong readings. But that was unusual. I have some scar tissue but I avoid those areas. I usually insert on stomach or back of arms.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    21. Michael Baker

      RARELY – only if the CGM reading is suspiciously low or high.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    22. Karen Brady

      G6, never calibrate.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    23. Patty Martin

      I often find that the 1st day is not accurate – often 40-60 points more or less. Sometimes on the last day of the 10 days is not accurate either.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    24. Becky Hertz

      Other. I leave it (Dex G6) alone unless I get weird readings or I feel it’s really off. I usually do a finger stick within the first 24 hours to double check that it is within range (+/- 20%).

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    25. LizB

      I use Medtronic so I am forced to calibrate a minimum of twice a day. Depending on timing I will sometimes do 3. I get great results from the Medtronic sensors although I know not everyone does. Reading these comments it’s obvious not everyone gets great results from Dexcom either. My sister uses Dexcom and wound up in DKA a couple of years ago. Just because you DON’T have to test with a meter doesn’t mean you shouldn’t!! They are not perfect and I’m amazed the FDA allows no testing.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    26. ellencherry

      I use the Dexcom G6 and while it doesn’t require calibration, I choose to use the ‘no code’ option which requires a daily calibration. I takes just a minute and my Dexcom is almost always accurate within 10 points. The peace of mind that comes with this option allows me to trust the device the other 23 hours and 59 minutes.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    27. Daniel Bestvater

      I usually calibrate my Dexcom G6 2-3 times per session. It seems to make it slightly more accurate, although probably not necessary.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    28. George O Hamilton

      DEX – G6. No routine calibrations. Often after the start-up of a new sensor, I will see a reading that seems strange for the trend and time of day. Those often need a meter check and calibration. Sometimes it takes 2 or 3 calibration adjustments to get smooth out with reliable readings.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    29. KSannie

      People always seem to assume that when the Dexcom 6 and the meter disagree, the meter must be correct and the Dexcom incorrect. However, both have been proven to be equally accurate. So after I started using the Dexcom 6, I just assumed it was always correct. I would only test during the 2-hour warmup period if it was time for a meal and I needed my pre-meal blood sugar.

      However, about 2 weeks ago, I had a very strange reading after inserting the Dexcom, so I tested and the Dexcom seemed completely wrong. I used two meter sugars to calibrate it (which were pretty close to identical). About 4 hours later, it seemed wrong, but not so far off. So I did two sugars with my meter, which were identical, and calibrated again. After that, no problems – it was back to normal behavior. So except for two weeks ago, I basically had not done meter sugars for about 18 months.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    30. Daniel Smith

      When I was on the libre, I couldn’t calibrate and my A1c average came back 20mg higher than what the libre predicted. I was really frustrated. I got a dexcom g6 and I am now calibrating once a day average. The first day is usually 3 times. Then I generally trust it.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    31. Lee Tincher

      I only calibrate when my symptoms do not match the CGM results.

      3
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    32. ConnieT1D62

      Never or Rarely, maybe 2 or 3 times a year (if that much) when/if DexG6 readings seem a little bit off. I occasionally self-test with a Contour NEXT meter while a new G6 sensor is in warm-up period but I don’t calibrate. I trust how Dexcom functions and have had consistently reliable experience with it.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    33. Wanacure

      I use an old One Touch meter, MDI, & and Dexcom G6. From chapter 4 of Dexcom G6 manual: “But sometimes you must use your meter instead of the G6…”when in doubt, get your meter out.” “You don’t have to calibrate, but you can.” Since my pharmacy refuses to sell me syringes marked in half units, I must eyeball for 1/2 unit delivery of insulins. People with pumps have the advantage of being able to really fine-tune the amounts & times of delivery. Would that be a factor in explaining why some folks can go months without calibrating? I sometimes must calibrate every couple of days. Calibrating over several months helped me avoid needless alarms yet still keep in the 70-130 range 95% of the time.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. NAK Marshall

        InPen allows .5 unit doses and also gives you the tracking, does the math, etc that a pump does. I adore mine. You just use cartridges that fit inside the reusable pen, same needles as other pens, and the InPen battery lasts a year.

        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    34. Abigail Elias

      Never. Have never encountered a situation where there was a system issue requiring calibration.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    35. TomH

      When I have an unusual series of readings or when a very low reading occurs and I don’t “feel” it.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    36. Amy Jo

      I regularly check finger sticks, so I calibrate if the CGM is consistently off by more than 10-20 mg/dL. Sometimes multiple times for a sensor, others not at all

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    37. William Schaffer

      Libre 14 day user. Not “calibrating”, more like correlating. The Libre is consistently reading 30-40% low compared with 2 different BGMs, so I don’t really trust it that much. At least it is off by about the same amount, no matter whether the sensor is new or 8 days in use. CGM is about 4 months old. I do the math in my head. I know if the reading is 60, BG is actually about 90; if the reading is 120, it’s actually about 180

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    38. Cheryl Seibert

      I only calibrate if BG differs from SG by +- 20%. When I am stressed, the Dexcom sensor sometimes will show a skyrocketing SG while the BG is still in range.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    39. NAK Marshall

      At first I checked at least once when inserting a new sensor, as I didn’t trust Dex G6 yet. Now only check with blood if something seems really off compared to my carb intake or ?? Occasionally after inserting a new one, it bounces up and down for several hours. That’s probably only once every 4 sensors.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    40. Abraham Remson

      Yes only because my supplies rum out because the has to get approval from the insurance company. Except this scenario I never use re calibration with a glucose meter

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    41. Andrea Graebner

      When the cgm is some what off from my finger prick / glucose monitor.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply

    If you wear a CGM that does not require regular calibrations, on average, how often do you choose to calibrate your CGM with a blood glucose meter reading? Cancel reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.




    101 Federal Street, Suite 440
    Boston, MA 02110
    Phone: 617-892-6100
    Email: admin@t1dexchange.org

    Privacy Policy

    Terms of Use

    Follow Us

    • facebook
    • twitter
    • linkedin
    • instagram

    © 2024 T1D Exchange.
    All Rights Reserved.

    © 2023 T1D Exchange. All Rights Reserved.
    • Login
    • Register

    Forgot Password

    Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

    Skip Next Finish

    Account successfully created.

    Please check your inbox and verify your email in the next 24 hours.

    Your Account Type

    Please select all that apply.

    I have type 1 diabetes

    I'm a parent/guardian of a person with type 1 diabetes

    I'm interested in the diabetes community or industry

    Select Topics

    We will customize your stories feed based on what you select here.

    [userselectcat]

    We're preparing your personalized page.

    This will only take a second...

    Search and filter

    [searchandfilter slug="sort-filter-post"]