Subscribe Now

[hb-subscribe]

Trending News

T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
  • Activity
    • 3 hours, 57 minutes ago
      D-connect likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      I have an MA in writing and lit, but gobbledegook is gobbledegook. The fancy term is obscurantism.
    • 3 hours, 58 minutes ago
      D-connect likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      They change all the time. Generally not in a direction to improve my health, but to increase the money in their wallet.
    • 4 hours ago
      D-connect likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 4 hours, 47 minutes ago
      Ahh Life likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      I have an MA in writing and lit, but gobbledegook is gobbledegook. The fancy term is obscurantism.
    • 4 hours, 48 minutes ago
      Ahh Life likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      Extremely. I have a certificate in Medical Billing & Coding.
    • 8 hours, 27 minutes ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      "Slightly," I think, maybe. Insurance companies change their policies, constantly. Prescription coverage changes every time I look at it. Medicare is a huge question mark. Honestly, Health insurance has become a big money making business, for them. I get different answers every time I call, depending upon whom I am talking with. I say it's time for socialized medicine.
    • 8 hours, 29 minutes ago
      atr likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 8 hours, 40 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Roughly half my lows are caused by my auto correct system now. I expect AI hallucinations to make it worse. I have enough hallucinations when I'm low and need non-hallucinatory help. We all need more info on this subject to make better decisions. As my favorite 80's AI robot (Johnny 5) said, "Need input."
    • 8 hours, 41 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I'm not comfortable for many reasons: 1) AI hasn't proven respects boundaries, quite the opposite, too many reports of AI tend to view its responsibilities and decisions as NOT mine; 2) the companies behind AI systems do likewise in not respecting my data as mine and jumble it in with their own; 3) AI systems haven't proven themselves as reliable parties regarding data and actions. There are many more; AI systems have a long way to go before I entrust one with dosing strategies while I'm awake, let alone while I'm asleep!
    • 8 hours, 41 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I’ve done a large 2 week focus group through Syracuse University on AI. I’ve also been watching shows on European news about AI and medical issues. AI still has too many glitches when it comes to medical issues.
    • 8 hours, 57 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 9 hours, 3 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Having recently dealt with ongoing tech issues involving our heat and electrical-use notifications for more than six months — and it’s still not fully resolved — I’m not always a fan of too much technology. That said, I am interested in advances like the Twist Insulin Pump potentially detecting scar tissue or helping with infusion-site issues. But then reality kicks in: taking devices off for MRIs, replacing failed equipment, and navigating Medicare when it’s primary insurance can become a nightmare of paperwork and delays. And honestly, AI in some call centers has been pretty frustrating. Sometimes it feels like no one can answer a real-world question anymore. I think we should tread lightly and make sure technology actually makes life easier for people living with T1D — especially older adults who already manage enough complexity every day. Some days I think about a less stress free life and going back to a syringe and insulin. over 45 years of doing that, and now 25+ of devices, I'm tired of the challenges in getting replacements, and scar tissue, and mail order supplies and on and on.
    • 9 hours, 14 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 1 day, 4 hours ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all technical advancements there are good things and bad things. The bad things (unforseen consequences) could be deadly like Hallucinations for the user, getting over doses of insulin. So, carefully thought out guard rails need to be developed and thoroughly tested. A good thing must be the accumulation of scenarios that KSannie mentioned. However it can not be completely autonomous. The current accuracy of Dex G7 and other sensors introduce error in to the calculations. This is similar to "self driving cars." The Robo taxi experiments have shown the unusual events that could become dangerous. Either audible situation commands or textual inputs like "goin to bed" or "driving" or "exercising" may be required at the beginning for a new user. As an example, after wearing my smart watch for a year now, it recognizes exercising without me having to tell it I'm exercising. This drives a more advanced and improved user interface. The other perceivable advantage might be accumulating changes over time, such as sicknesses, weight gain or loss, or changes in activity. Changes in food intake might be difficult to overcome. Something like "Under my Fork" app. Personally, I would like to see a reminder to bolis before eating! With all that said, we do we need all that? Probably not. Evolution of modified closed loop control may eliminate the need for AI control. The reality may be somewhere in-between the two.
    • 1 day, 4 hours ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 1 day, 4 hours ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I’m uncomfortable not knowing when and when it isn’t being used, but I’m not sure why really. A “singer” named Benny Rivers popped up in one of my feeds. I really liked the music, until I found out it was a total AI fabrication. Then I was uncomfortable. Why? I felt “taken”, like someone pulled a fast one on me, pulled the wool over my eyes. I liked the music less then. I didn’t like that I couldn’t find a tour date, things like that. But I was most uncomfortable not truly understanding why it made me uncomfortable. The music was still enjoyable.
    • 1 day, 6 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Having recently dealt with ongoing tech issues involving our heat and electrical-use notifications for more than six months — and it’s still not fully resolved — I’m not always a fan of too much technology. That said, I am interested in advances like the Twist Insulin Pump potentially detecting scar tissue or helping with infusion-site issues. But then reality kicks in: taking devices off for MRIs, replacing failed equipment, and navigating Medicare when it’s primary insurance can become a nightmare of paperwork and delays. And honestly, AI in some call centers has been pretty frustrating. Sometimes it feels like no one can answer a real-world question anymore. I think we should tread lightly and make sure technology actually makes life easier for people living with T1D — especially older adults who already manage enough complexity every day. Some days I think about a less stress free life and going back to a syringe and insulin. over 45 years of doing that, and now 25+ of devices, I'm tired of the challenges in getting replacements, and scar tissue, and mail order supplies and on and on.
    • 1 day, 6 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all technical advancements there are good things and bad things. The bad things (unforseen consequences) could be deadly like Hallucinations for the user, getting over doses of insulin. So, carefully thought out guard rails need to be developed and thoroughly tested. A good thing must be the accumulation of scenarios that KSannie mentioned. However it can not be completely autonomous. The current accuracy of Dex G7 and other sensors introduce error in to the calculations. This is similar to "self driving cars." The Robo taxi experiments have shown the unusual events that could become dangerous. Either audible situation commands or textual inputs like "goin to bed" or "driving" or "exercising" may be required at the beginning for a new user. As an example, after wearing my smart watch for a year now, it recognizes exercising without me having to tell it I'm exercising. This drives a more advanced and improved user interface. The other perceivable advantage might be accumulating changes over time, such as sicknesses, weight gain or loss, or changes in activity. Changes in food intake might be difficult to overcome. Something like "Under my Fork" app. Personally, I would like to see a reminder to bolis before eating! With all that said, we do we need all that? Probably not. Evolution of modified closed loop control may eliminate the need for AI control. The reality may be somewhere in-between the two.
    • 1 day, 6 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Sorry. I'm not sold on AI. I don't trust the people making it. There are too many reasons it could go wrong and be disasterous (just read the above comments). I'm not opposed to computers helping with things such as Control IQ, but when the computer starts doing the thinking, I think we've crossed the line. An aside: I've listened to AI music, and I think it sounds impersonal. It lacks a humanness. I don't find it pleasant to listen to. I've heard horror stories about AI being used by the military, with the end result being nuclear holocaust. I am a hard NO to AI. I gave it a "5".
    • 1 day, 6 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 1 day, 7 hours ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 1 day, 7 hours ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 1 day, 7 hours ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 1 day, 8 hours ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Sorry. I'm not sold on AI. I don't trust the people making it. There are too many reasons it could go wrong and be disasterous (just read the above comments). I'm not opposed to computers helping with things such as Control IQ, but when the computer starts doing the thinking, I think we've crossed the line. An aside: I've listened to AI music, and I think it sounds impersonal. It lacks a humanness. I don't find it pleasant to listen to. I've heard horror stories about AI being used by the military, with the end result being nuclear holocaust. I am a hard NO to AI. I gave it a "5".
    • 1 day, 8 hours ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    Clear All
Pages
    • T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
    • Articles
    • Community
      • About
      • Insights
      • T1D Screening
        • T1D Screening How-To
        • T1D Screening Results
        • T1D Screening Resources
      • Donate
      • Join the Community
    • Quality Improvement
      • About
      • Collaborative
        • Leadership
        • Committees
      • Centers
      • Meet the Experts
      • Learning Sessions
      • Resources
        • Change Packages
        • Sick Day Guide
        • FOH Screener
        • T1D Care Plans
      • Portal
      • Health Equity
        • Heal Advisors
    • Registry
      • About
      • Recruit for the Registry
    • Research
      • About
      • Publications
      • COVID-19 Research
      • Our Initiatives
    • Partnerships
      • About
      • Industry Partnerships
      • Academic Partnerships
      • Previous Work
    • About
      • Team
      • Board of Directors
      • Culture & Careers
      • Annual Report
    • Join / Login
    • Search
    • Donate

    While CGM sensors are approved to wear for 7 to 14 days, how many days do you find your CGM sensor gives you the most accurate readings?

    Home > LC Polls > While CGM sensors are approved to wear for 7 to 14 days, how many days do you find your CGM sensor gives you the most accurate readings?
    Previous

    Sometimes it can be hard to hear important CGM alerts, especially overnight. Do you use a secondary app or device to help you hear them better?

    Next

    If you use a CGM, at what glucose level is your “high” alert set? If you use multiple alert schedules, select the number that is your “high” alert at midnight in your local time zone.

    Samantha Walsh

    Samantha Walsh has lived with type 1 diabetes for over five years since 2017. After her T1D diagnosis, she was eager to give back to the diabetes community. She is the Community and Partner Manager for T1D Exchange and helps to manage the Online Community and recruit for the T1D Exchange Registry. Prior to T1D Exchange, Samantha fundraised at Joslin Diabetes Center. She graduated from the University of Massachusetts with a Bachelors degree in sociology and early childhood education.

    Related Stories

    " At T1D Exchange, we’re proud to announce our Medical and Research Advisory Team — an accomplished group of leaders in endocrinology, research, and quality improvement. Together, they are redefining what’s possible in type 1 diabetes (T1D) care through rigorous data analysis, innovative research approaches, and real-world implementation. Their collective expertise is central to our mission of improving outcomes for all people living with T1D.  “We’re excited to be working with our advisors given their deep expertise across a broad range of areas in T1D,” said Dave Walton, CEO of T1D Exchange. “Their involvement magnifies our reach, knowledge, and impact. These advisors are shaping the future of diabetes care — driving innovation across research, clinical practice, and quality improvement.”    Meet the Medical & Research Advisory Team  The T1D Exchange Medical and Research Advisory Team brings together four leading endocrinologists, each offering a unique perspective and shared commitment to advancing T1D care:    Jenise Wong, MD, PhD Pediatric endocrinologist at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at the University of California, San Francisco Focus areas: Diabetes technology adoption and usability; health equity and access to care and technology; community-based and peer-support interventions; culturally responsive care          Jennifer Sherr, MD, PhD Pediatric endocrinologist at Yale Medicine and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut Focus areas: Clinical trials in diabetes technology (CGM and AID systems), disease-modifying treatments and immunotherapies, and emerging technologies and medications, including continuous ketone monitoring and nasal glucagon     Viral Shah, MD Adult endocrinologist at Indiana University Health and Professor of Medicine in the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism at Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis, Indiana Focus areas: Diabetes technology and adjunctive therapy trials; translational and data-driven research; T1D complications and bone health         Nestoras Mathioudakis, MD, MHS Adult endocrinologist at Johns Hopkins Medicine and Associate Professor of Medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland Focus areas: AI-driven clinical support tools; EMR-based data analytics for clinical decision making; data-driven quality improvement; health equity in T1D care        This accomplished team’s expertise spans adult and pediatric endocrinology, research, and quality improvement affiliated with leading institutions nationwide. Collectively, they have authored over 500 diabetes publications and secured research funding from organizations such as the National Institutes of Health, Helmsley Charitable Trust, the American Diabetes Association, and Breakthrough T1D — while remaining actively engaged in both clinical care and research.  “These individuals represent an impressive body of work while remaining deeply involved in the day-to-day realities of diabetes care,” said Walton. Their expertise covers the full spectrum of T1D care — from AI and predictive analytics to complication prevention, automated insulin delivery, continuous glucose and ketone monitoring, GLP-1 treatments, health equity, mental health, autoantibody screening, and disease prevention.    Turning insight into impact  The team’s work goes beyond research, focusing on translating insights into real-world practice. By leveraging data to scale best practices, the goal is to drive meaningful, measurable change across clinics and communities.  “Our advisors will help to extend our impact — whether through QI strategy, research innovation, funding opportunities, or new data-driven solutions,” said Walton. “We want to take what’s working at individual centers and spread that as broadly as possible.”   He added, “As a Collaborative, we’re also focused on advanced population health strategies such as exploring predictive data models to identify risks earlier and intervene before complications even begin to happen.”    The power of the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative  Central to this work is the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative (T1DX-QI) — a nationwide network of clinics working together to improve care through shared data, benchmarking, and evidence-based practices.  “I’m thrilled to serve as a Medical Advisor for T1D Exchange, because I’ve seen firsthand the impact this network can have on patient care,” said Dr. Nestoras Mathioudakis. “T1D Exchange is the premier organization for quality improvement in type 1 diabetes, with unparalleled assets like a large EHR database and robust patient registry.”  He added that he is excited to apply his expertise in EHR research and big data analytics to generate real-world evidence across diagnosis, management, and outcomes.  Dr. Viral Shah echoed that perspective, reflecting on T1DX-QI's evolution: “I have been involved with T1D Exchange since its early days and have had the privilege of witnessing how it has transformed the quality of diabetes care across the United States. I’m delighted to return as a Medical Advisor.”  He emphasized the importance of accelerating impact. “I look forward to working closely with the team to accelerate the evidence generation and to help translate these insights to improve patient care.”   Dr. Jenise Wong highlighted the visible impact of T1DX-QI on the delivery of care. "I’m truly honored and grateful to be working with T1D Exchange as a Medical Advisor. T1DX-QI is a remarkable resource for centers that are using continuous process improvement to improve the quality of care for people living with diabetes.”  “Diabetes centers working with T1DX –QI have done amazing work using QI methodology to make care accessible and equitable for all people with diabetes,” she said. “It’s inspiring to be a part of a collaborative in which centers have been creative and thoughtful with initiatives to address individual and systemic challenges to care, improving clinical outcomes as well as the patient experience."  Looking ahead, Dr. Sherr highlighted the opportunity to build on the existing strong foundation. “I’m very excited to be working as a Medical Advisor for T1D Exchange,” she said. “It’s a privilege to help shape what comes next for a group that’s already doing such impactful work.”  “Sharing what’s happening in clinical practice, benchmarking across centers, and understanding outcomes is how we figure out what’s working, what’s not, and where we go next,” she said.      The future of T1D care   With this team’s vision and expertise, T1D Exchange is positioned to accelerate progress in T1D care — bridging research and real-world practice to drive meaningful, measurable impact.  Together, we look forward to advancing innovation and improving outcomes for everyone affected by type 1 diabetes.   "

    3 days ago  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Improving Diabetes Care Through Precision Medicine 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 week ago 8 min read  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Bridging Research, Technology, and Real-World Care 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 week ago 9 min read  
    Insulin & Meds

    Ask the Expert: Diana Isaacs on Benefits, Risks, and Real-World Use of GLP-1s in T1D 

    Jewels Doskicz, 2 weeks ago 6 min read  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Advancing Equity, Improving Outcomes, and Reducing the Burden of T1D 

    Jewels Doskicz, 4 weeks ago 8 min read  
    Our team

    Spotlight on T1DX-QI: Clinical Leadership Committee 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 month ago 6 min read  

    40 Comments

    1. Jian

      I think I have been wearing a Dexcom sensor for at least 14 yrs and my sensors have lasted 10 days every time except one.

      1
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    2. jamesmpii

      For me Libre 2 is accurate enough from start to end of the 14 days its programmed for.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    3. Beckett Nelson

      I usually get 20good days. Hit 30 days once. Usually about 2 days after restarting for the 2nd or 3rd time it craps out

      1
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    4. Rob Smith

      Dexcom G6. Just changed after 30 days. Usually get 20+days (2 restarts) before it craps out.

      0
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Jane Cerullo

        Hi sometimes wish was back on G6. Like you I could usually get 20 days. Actually liked better that the G7 I have now in some ways. G7 says use upper back arm. Have knocked few off. Never happened with G6. I get a lot of compression lows at night. But like the flat smaller device. And the zero warm up time.

        2 years ago Log in to Reply
    5. Gary Rind

      Libre3 last for 14 days but the first day is squirrelly. Why the latest sensor needs a 12 hour warmup is beyond me!

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    6. Richard Vaughn

      I am still using the Dexcom G6 which lasts no more than 10 days. With arthritis in my hands, I cannot do the steps involved in reusing the sensor. I get at most 8 days of reasonably accurate numbers when comparing with glucometer numbers.

      1
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Ahh Life

        I had to chuckle at the facile UTube videos showing a blithe and simple extension to the G6. Arthritis drives a stake through that thought’s heart as good as any vampire.

        2 years ago Log in to Reply
    7. Lawrence S.

      I use Dexcom G6. I usually get the full 10 days out of a sensor. Occasionally, I get on the goes out on day 7, 8, or 9, but not often. There was one period a few months ago when I had about 5 different sensors go out early. That seems to have passed. I figured it was a bad batch.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    8. Janice B

      G6 is a 10 day wear

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    9. mojoseje

      I use Medtronic Smartguard and it sometimes lasts the full seven days but usually starts getting glitchy at 5 to 6 days.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    10. Jane Cerullo

      Use Dexcom G7. Seems accurate for the full 10 days. Sometimes a little off for the first few hours.

      1
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    11. Gary Taylor

      I use the latest Medtronic Sensor 4. Approved for 7 days but I usually push it to 14 days. Readings are usually accurate for the duration. I have never tried to push it past 14 days, but a Medtronic rep told me of a colleague who wore it for 21 to 28 days.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    12. Bea Anderson

      Usually 10. But when the rare failure happens, it is a big deal. I really appreciate how well the Dexcom works. No matter the tech, I still need to be on my toes and be prepared to check the math, and whatever else to manage insulin levels!! Would love a 14 day routine!!

      1
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    13. Lindsey Whitnell

      We had a batch (maybe a month or two) that really only lasted 7 days, but lately all sensors have lasted the full 10 days (knock on wood)!

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Gerald Wertz

        If you have ANY and I mean ANY issues with a Dexcom sensor not working call them and explain. They will replace almost anything free. My son ripped a few out swimming. They replaced both. Had 2 bad sites. They replaced them all!

        2 years ago Log in to Reply
    14. mlettinga

      I’ve got my
      G6 a couple times to do 20 days by fluke but kept forgetting the trick to get it to do it. Any suggestions to where find best way or share your secret?

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Gerald Wertz

        Unfortunately I tried and could not find a G6 workaround. You cannot pull out and put the transmitter in because it will remove the sensor so you can’t even swap transmitters to allow it to last longer. I hope you have better luck finding a solution.

        2 years ago Log in to Reply
      2. Tracy Jean

        You can pop out the transmitter with a test strip and restart.

        2
        2 years ago Log in to Reply
    15. Natalie Daley

      Libre 3 works for the full 14 days the way it’s supposed to. I haven’t been able to use my IPhone with the 3. I wish they would fix the program, so I wouldn’t have to carry the separate cranky reader.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    16. KCR

      So much depends on the sensor location and who knows what other factors. (Also I use calibration mode on my G6.) I recently restarted a 10 day sensor and had accurate numbers for 18 days. My current sensor has been off quite a lot, by as much as 20-40 points. Go figure!

      1
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    17. Nevin Bowman

      A better question is “ do you check the accuracy of your cgm?”

      4
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    18. Janis Senungetuk

      Wear the G6, usually for 10 days with the first 12 hours a definite wild guess requiring manual meter testing.

      2
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    19. Gerald Wertz

      With my Dexcom G6, it maxes out at 10 days. I have NO choice but to insert a new sensor. I the only CGM that had a workaround where you can fool it into believing that it had been changed. I believe it was a Medtronic 740 or something.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Lucia Maya

        the G6 can be restarted pretty easily. good YouTube videos showing how. I do it every time and it works well for another 4-8 days.

        1
        2 years ago Log in to Reply
    20. Edward Geary

      Good question: as a longtime Dexcom user, I have experienced a disturbing trend of sensors recording inconsistent readings beginning on or about day eight of a ten day cycle. In addition, sensors “lose” connection more frequently around day eight. DexCom has politely replaced failed sensors, however, the call wait times and overseas/global technical support teams are time consuming and frustrating particularly when compared to service experiences. The sensors are often unreliable for dosing decisions after day eight.

      2
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    21. Bruce Schnitzler

      The CGM brand I use expires at 10 days after starting.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    22. Kathleen Juzenas

      I don’t do finger pricks or calibrate. My Dexcom G7 lasts a full ten days but I haven’t been checking for accuracy. Maybe I should/will.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    23. mbulzomi@optonline.net

      If you are using, a Dexcom (Dex) Sensor you can only get 10 days on a G6, and 10 1/2 days usage on a G7,
      I get about 10 days of good readings. on my Dex G7.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    24. Juha Kankaanpaa

      With dexcom G6 the first 24-36 hours are often really far off the mark. After that the accuracy is fairly good, but often the last day or two there seem to connection and reading g errors.

      1
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    25. Anthony Harder

      I use a Dexcom G7. The sensor expires at 10 days + 12 hours. It is not possible to extend use longer than that. It is financially foolish to shut it off shorter than that. I find readings to be relatively constant/correct during this usage window.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    26. Kathy Morison

      My dexcom G7 sensor doesn’t give me any options. They give you 10 days plus 12 hours g
      race to get a new sensor on after that it’s dead.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    27. Amanda Barras

      5-7 days. First day is always off z first 12 hours. Also when I restart a Dex it is also off 12-24 hours and even then still off 20+ for subsequent days. Calibrations do help bring it in line.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    28. Melinda Lipe

      ??? The G7 cuts off at 10 days so that is as long as it can be worn. Am I mistaken?

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Lucia Maya

        you can restart it – there are good YouTube videos showing how, it’s easy!

        2 years ago Log in to Reply
      2. Lucia Maya

        oops, sorry! thought you meant the G6.

        2 years ago Log in to Reply
    29. James Cheairs

      I purposefully have remained on the G6 as I consistently get 20 days per sensor with the restart. Yes, the first day of the restart is a bit whacky but I just calibrate several times until it settles down. I just purchased an Anubis transmitter so am looking forward to the ability to not have to change the transmitter every 90 days. I know there will come a day when the G6 is no longer available but until then, I am happy with this CGM.

      0
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. LizB

        I do the same. First day is usually off for awhile, whether it’s brand new or a restart, but I calibrate and it settles down. It then works great for at least the first 10 days. After a restart I don’t always get another 10 days but I often do.

        1
        2 years ago Log in to Reply
    30. Sheri Marcus

      Now that I have the Dexcom G7 it has a 12 hour grace period. So of course I take advantage of that 12 hours and change out every 10.5 days.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    31. T1D4LongTime

      Dexcom G6 and G7 are 10-day CGM sensors. I normally get accurate readings through the 10th day. Occasionally, at the end of the 9th day, the readings will be erratic,

      2 years ago Log in to Reply

    While CGM sensors are approved to wear for 7 to 14 days, how many days do you find your CGM sensor gives you the most accurate readings? Cancel reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.




    101 Federal Street, Suite 440
    Boston, MA 02110
    Phone: 617-892-6100
    Email: admin@t1dexchange.org

    Privacy Policy

    Terms of Use

    Follow Us

    • facebook
    • twitter
    • linkedin
    • instagram

    © 2024 T1D Exchange.
    All Rights Reserved.

    © 2023 T1D Exchange. All Rights Reserved.
    • Login
    • Register

    Forgot Password

    Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

    Skip Next Finish

    Account successfully created.

    Please check your inbox and verify your email in the next 24 hours.

    Your Account Type

    Please select all that apply.

    I have type 1 diabetes

    I'm a parent/guardian of a person with type 1 diabetes

    I'm interested in the diabetes community or industry

    Select Topics

    We will customize your stories feed based on what you select here.

    [userselectcat]

    We're preparing your personalized page.

    This will only take a second...

    Search and filter

    [searchandfilter slug="sort-filter-post"]