Subscribe Now

[hb-subscribe]

Trending News

T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
  • Activity
    • 5 minutes ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all technical advancements there are good things and bad things. The bad things (unforseen consequences) could be deadly like Hallucinations for the user, getting over doses of insulin. So, carefully thought out guard rails need to be developed and thoroughly tested. A good thing must be the accumulation of scenarios that KSannie mentioned. However it can not be completely autonomous. The current accuracy of Dex G7 and other sensors introduce error in to the calculations. This is similar to "self driving cars." The Robo taxi experiments have shown the unusual events that could become dangerous. Either audible situation commands or textual inputs like "goin to bed" or "driving" or "exercising" may be required at the beginning for a new user. As an example, after wearing my smart watch for a year now, it recognizes exercising without me having to tell it I'm exercising. This drives a more advanced and improved user interface. The other perceivable advantage might be accumulating changes over time, such as sicknesses, weight gain or loss, or changes in activity. Changes in food intake might be difficult to overcome. Something like "Under my Fork" app. Personally, I would like to see a reminder to bolis before eating! With all that said, we do we need all that? Probably not. Evolution of modified closed loop control may eliminate the need for AI control. The reality may be somewhere in-between the two.
    • 6 minutes ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 6 minutes ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 7 minutes ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I’m uncomfortable not knowing when and when it isn’t being used, but I’m not sure why really. A “singer” named Benny Rivers popped up in one of my feeds. I really liked the music, until I found out it was a total AI fabrication. Then I was uncomfortable. Why? I felt “taken”, like someone pulled a fast one on me, pulled the wool over my eyes. I liked the music less then. I didn’t like that I couldn’t find a tour date, things like that. But I was most uncomfortable not truly understanding why it made me uncomfortable. The music was still enjoyable.
    • 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Having recently dealt with ongoing tech issues involving our heat and electrical-use notifications for more than six months — and it’s still not fully resolved — I’m not always a fan of too much technology. That said, I am interested in advances like the Twist Insulin Pump potentially detecting scar tissue or helping with infusion-site issues. But then reality kicks in: taking devices off for MRIs, replacing failed equipment, and navigating Medicare when it’s primary insurance can become a nightmare of paperwork and delays. And honestly, AI in some call centers has been pretty frustrating. Sometimes it feels like no one can answer a real-world question anymore. I think we should tread lightly and make sure technology actually makes life easier for people living with T1D — especially older adults who already manage enough complexity every day. Some days I think about a less stress free life and going back to a syringe and insulin. over 45 years of doing that, and now 25+ of devices, I'm tired of the challenges in getting replacements, and scar tissue, and mail order supplies and on and on.
    • 1 hour, 43 minutes ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all technical advancements there are good things and bad things. The bad things (unforseen consequences) could be deadly like Hallucinations for the user, getting over doses of insulin. So, carefully thought out guard rails need to be developed and thoroughly tested. A good thing must be the accumulation of scenarios that KSannie mentioned. However it can not be completely autonomous. The current accuracy of Dex G7 and other sensors introduce error in to the calculations. This is similar to "self driving cars." The Robo taxi experiments have shown the unusual events that could become dangerous. Either audible situation commands or textual inputs like "goin to bed" or "driving" or "exercising" may be required at the beginning for a new user. As an example, after wearing my smart watch for a year now, it recognizes exercising without me having to tell it I'm exercising. This drives a more advanced and improved user interface. The other perceivable advantage might be accumulating changes over time, such as sicknesses, weight gain or loss, or changes in activity. Changes in food intake might be difficult to overcome. Something like "Under my Fork" app. Personally, I would like to see a reminder to bolis before eating! With all that said, we do we need all that? Probably not. Evolution of modified closed loop control may eliminate the need for AI control. The reality may be somewhere in-between the two.
    • 1 hour, 44 minutes ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Sorry. I'm not sold on AI. I don't trust the people making it. There are too many reasons it could go wrong and be disasterous (just read the above comments). I'm not opposed to computers helping with things such as Control IQ, but when the computer starts doing the thinking, I think we've crossed the line. An aside: I've listened to AI music, and I think it sounds impersonal. It lacks a humanness. I don't find it pleasant to listen to. I've heard horror stories about AI being used by the military, with the end result being nuclear holocaust. I am a hard NO to AI. I gave it a "5".
    • 1 hour, 48 minutes ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 2 hours, 53 minutes ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 2 hours, 53 minutes ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 2 hours, 53 minutes ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 3 hours, 30 minutes ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Sorry. I'm not sold on AI. I don't trust the people making it. There are too many reasons it could go wrong and be disasterous (just read the above comments). I'm not opposed to computers helping with things such as Control IQ, but when the computer starts doing the thinking, I think we've crossed the line. An aside: I've listened to AI music, and I think it sounds impersonal. It lacks a humanness. I don't find it pleasant to listen to. I've heard horror stories about AI being used by the military, with the end result being nuclear holocaust. I am a hard NO to AI. I gave it a "5".
    • 3 hours, 31 minutes ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 3 hours, 34 minutes ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 3 hours, 34 minutes ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 3 hours, 36 minutes ago
      Mike S likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 3 hours, 59 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      Do you have a management plan if you test positive for ketones? Please share more in the comments.
      Sure, if you can call it a plan to flush with liquids and take electrolytes and insulin as needed.
    • 3 hours, 59 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      Do you have a management plan if you test positive for ketones? Please share more in the comments.
      Inject. Inject. Inject. All other considerations are secondary, tertiary, or way down the list. Why would anyone ever rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic? Might as well strike up the band to play Nearer My God to Thee!. ☹
    • 4 hours ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 4 hours ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      Do you have a management plan if you test positive for ketones? Please share more in the comments.
      It would depend on the symptoms and vary.
    • 4 hours, 1 minute ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 4 hours, 2 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 4 hours, 2 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      2 It already is. But needs to be checked occasionally. I don't want a person inside me every five minutes.
    • 4 hours, 6 minutes ago
      KCR likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 4 hours, 11 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    Clear All
Pages
    • T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
    • Articles
    • Community
      • About
      • Insights
      • T1D Screening
        • T1D Screening How-To
        • T1D Screening Results
        • T1D Screening Resources
      • Donate
      • Join the Community
    • Quality Improvement
      • About
      • Collaborative
        • Leadership
        • Committees
      • Centers
      • Meet the Experts
      • Learning Sessions
      • Resources
        • Change Packages
        • Sick Day Guide
        • FOH Screener
        • T1D Care Plans
      • Portal
      • Health Equity
        • Heal Advisors
    • Registry
      • About
      • Recruit for the Registry
    • Research
      • About
      • Publications
      • COVID-19 Research
      • Our Initiatives
    • Partnerships
      • About
      • Industry Partnerships
      • Academic Partnerships
      • Previous Work
    • About
      • Team
      • Board of Directors
      • Culture & Careers
      • Annual Report
    • Join / Login
    • Search
    • Donate

    If you have at least one diabetes-related complication, for how many years had you been living with T1D when you were diagnosed with the first complication?

    Home > LC Polls > If you have at least one diabetes-related complication, for how many years had you been living with T1D when you were diagnosed with the first complication?
    Previous

    Have you ever used expired glucose strips? If so, share in the comments whether you noticed any differences from unexpired strips.

    Next

    How important is the standard deviation (SD) measurement to you? (SD is a measure of a person’s variation in glucose readings)

    Sarah Howard

    Sarah Howard has worked in the diabetes research field ever since she was diagnosed with T1D while in college in May 2013. Since then, she has worked for various diabetes organizations, focusing on research, advocacy, and community-building efforts for people with T1D and their loved ones. Sarah is currently the Senior Marketing Manager at T1D Exchange.

    Related Stories

    " At T1D Exchange, we’re proud to announce our Medical and Research Advisory Team — an accomplished group of leaders in endocrinology, research, and quality improvement. Together, they are redefining what’s possible in type 1 diabetes (T1D) care through rigorous data analysis, innovative research approaches, and real-world implementation. Their collective expertise is central to our mission of improving outcomes for all people living with T1D.  “We’re excited to be working with our advisors given their deep expertise across a broad range of areas in T1D,” said Dave Walton, CEO of T1D Exchange. “Their involvement magnifies our reach, knowledge, and impact. These advisors are shaping the future of diabetes care — driving innovation across research, clinical practice, and quality improvement.”    Meet the Medical & Research Advisory Team  The T1D Exchange Medical and Research Advisory Team brings together four leading endocrinologists, each offering a unique perspective and shared commitment to advancing T1D care:    Jenise Wong, MD, PhD Pediatric endocrinologist at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at the University of California, San Francisco Focus areas: Diabetes technology adoption and usability; health equity and access to care and technology; community-based and peer-support interventions; culturally responsive care          Jennifer Sherr, MD, PhD Pediatric endocrinologist at Yale Medicine and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut Focus areas: Clinical trials in diabetes technology (CGM and AID systems), disease-modifying treatments and immunotherapies, and emerging technologies and medications, including continuous ketone monitoring and nasal glucagon     Viral Shah, MD Adult endocrinologist at Indiana University Health and Professor of Medicine in the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism at Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis, Indiana Focus areas: Diabetes technology and adjunctive therapy trials; translational and data-driven research; T1D complications and bone health         Nestoras Mathioudakis, MD, MHS Adult endocrinologist at Johns Hopkins Medicine and Associate Professor of Medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland Focus areas: AI-driven clinical support tools; EMR-based data analytics for clinical decision making; data-driven quality improvement; health equity in T1D care        This accomplished team’s expertise spans adult and pediatric endocrinology, research, and quality improvement affiliated with leading institutions nationwide. Collectively, they have authored over 500 diabetes publications and secured research funding from organizations such as the National Institutes of Health, Helmsley Charitable Trust, the American Diabetes Association, and Breakthrough T1D — while remaining actively engaged in both clinical care and research.  “These individuals represent an impressive body of work while remaining deeply involved in the day-to-day realities of diabetes care,” said Walton. Their expertise covers the full spectrum of T1D care — from AI and predictive analytics to complication prevention, automated insulin delivery, continuous glucose and ketone monitoring, GLP-1 treatments, health equity, mental health, autoantibody screening, and disease prevention.    Turning insight into impact  The team’s work goes beyond research, focusing on translating insights into real-world practice. By leveraging data to scale best practices, the goal is to drive meaningful, measurable change across clinics and communities.  “Our advisors will help to extend our impact — whether through QI strategy, research innovation, funding opportunities, or new data-driven solutions,” said Walton. “We want to take what’s working at individual centers and spread that as broadly as possible.”   He added, “As a Collaborative, we’re also focused on advanced population health strategies such as exploring predictive data models to identify risks earlier and intervene before complications even begin to happen.”    The power of the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative  Central to this work is the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative (T1DX-QI) — a nationwide network of clinics working together to improve care through shared data, benchmarking, and evidence-based practices.  “I’m thrilled to serve as a Medical Advisor for T1D Exchange, because I’ve seen firsthand the impact this network can have on patient care,” said Dr. Nestoras Mathioudakis. “T1D Exchange is the premier organization for quality improvement in type 1 diabetes, with unparalleled assets like a large EHR database and robust patient registry.”  He added that he is excited to apply his expertise in EHR research and big data analytics to generate real-world evidence across diagnosis, management, and outcomes.  Dr. Viral Shah echoed that perspective, reflecting on T1DX-QI's evolution: “I have been involved with T1D Exchange since its early days and have had the privilege of witnessing how it has transformed the quality of diabetes care across the United States. I’m delighted to return as a Medical Advisor.”  He emphasized the importance of accelerating impact. “I look forward to working closely with the team to accelerate the evidence generation and to help translate these insights to improve patient care.”   Dr. Jenise Wong highlighted the visible impact of T1DX-QI on the delivery of care. "I’m truly honored and grateful to be working with T1D Exchange as a Medical Advisor. T1DX-QI is a remarkable resource for centers that are using continuous process improvement to improve the quality of care for people living with diabetes.”  “Diabetes centers working with T1DX –QI have done amazing work using QI methodology to make care accessible and equitable for all people with diabetes,” she said. “It’s inspiring to be a part of a collaborative in which centers have been creative and thoughtful with initiatives to address individual and systemic challenges to care, improving clinical outcomes as well as the patient experience."  Looking ahead, Dr. Sherr highlighted the opportunity to build on the existing strong foundation. “I’m very excited to be working as a Medical Advisor for T1D Exchange,” she said. “It’s a privilege to help shape what comes next for a group that’s already doing such impactful work.”  “Sharing what’s happening in clinical practice, benchmarking across centers, and understanding outcomes is how we figure out what’s working, what’s not, and where we go next,” she said.      The future of T1D care   With this team’s vision and expertise, T1D Exchange is positioned to accelerate progress in T1D care — bridging research and real-world practice to drive meaningful, measurable impact.  Together, we look forward to advancing innovation and improving outcomes for everyone affected by type 1 diabetes.   "

    2 days ago  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Improving Diabetes Care Through Precision Medicine 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 week ago 8 min read  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Bridging Research, Technology, and Real-World Care 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 week ago 9 min read  
    Insulin & Meds

    Ask the Expert: Diana Isaacs on Benefits, Risks, and Real-World Use of GLP-1s in T1D 

    Jewels Doskicz, 2 weeks ago 6 min read  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Advancing Equity, Improving Outcomes, and Reducing the Burden of T1D 

    Jewels Doskicz, 4 weeks ago 8 min read  
    Our team

    Spotlight on T1DX-QI: Clinical Leadership Committee 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 month ago 6 min read  

    21 Comments

    1. Stephen Woodward

      Hypothyroid, not exactly a complication.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    2. Ahh Life

      Rx’d in 1951. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in 1975. Proliferative diabetic neuropathy (PDN) in 2019, gastroparesis in 2020. Life’s been that Forrest Gump box of chocolates — you never know what you’re going to get. Life is good and modern technology gives you a much better chance of getting some really, really good chocolates, however. ≧◠ᴥ◠≦✊

      11
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    3. Sahran Holiday

      Some retinopathy right eye treated with laser and left eye with drops. Right eye it’s not there, left eye barely there.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    4. Mary Dexter

      Doctors avoid diagnosing complications because it causes their ratings to drop. Doctors and HMOs receive ratings based on patients A1C, number of cancer screenings, and number of patients with complications. So my shoulder may be frozen, my feet numb, but no diagnosis or even mention will appear in my medical records.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    5. Mick Martin

      About 7 years after diagnosis I was informed that I’d developed diabetic retinopathy, which was ‘picked up’ at a routine examination to see my opthalmologist. I began receiving laser therapy just over one week later, and this has been ongoing now for more than 30 years.

      Within two years of that original diagnosis, I started feeling ‘stabbing sensations’ within both of my feet and lower legs. I reported this to my diabetes support team and they arranged for me to undergo testing to determine whether I’d developed peripheral neuropathy I had. For about the last 25 years I haven’t been able to feel my feet or lower legs.

      I’ve subsequently gone on to develop of other diabetes-related complications, such as autonomic neuropathy, and severe cataract formations which have resulted in me requiring to have my own lens removed, and replacement plastic lenses inserted.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    6. connie ker

      It was so encouraging to see the graph of no complications being the highest percentage on the bar line. Happy 100th birthday to insulin this year!

      4
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    7. GLORIA MILLER

      I marked N/A by mistake. I should have marked no complications to date after 64 years. I am a healthy individual who happens to have diabetes.

      6
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    8. Daniel Bestvater

      I marked other. I have hypothyroidism and adhesive capsulitis of all of my large joints. The joint issues have been a bit of a problem, difficult to move the arms and legs some days. It is not RA and has been described as though cement has been poured in and around my joints. I have had several surgeries to loosen up the joints but this is only a temporary fix that lasts about 6 months. These are all autoimmune disorders, so technically not complications. I have had T1D for approximately 45 years.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    9. Shannon Barnaby

      31 years and no complications yet.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    10. Natalie Daley

      Hashimoto’s Syndrome and early cataract replacements

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    11. Jeanne McMillan-Olson

      I started getting hypersensitivity in my big toes when I was about 32 years old. I had had diabetes for about 23 years. I wasn’t diagnosed as most physicians didn’t know much about T1D or the complications. I have had T1D now for 66 years.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    12. Andrew Stewart

      T1D for 31 years and no complications. I agree with and support Gloria Miller’s comment “I am a healthy individual who happens to have diabetes”.

      I did recently listen to the Juicebox Podcast episode #531, After Dark: Diabetes Complications and it scared the (insert your favorite swear word) out of me. I don’t think I’ll listen to the remaining 42 minutes as I got the point, complications are real and they’re devastating and we should always try our best to stay in range to prevent, delay, minimize them. The thing is perfection doesn’t exist, so don’t beat yourself up, stay positive and keep learning this crazy game of T1D.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    13. Amanda Barras

      Hypothyroidism 13 years in
      hypertension 17 years in.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    14. Janis Senungetuk

      Dx T1D in 1955. Proliferative diabetic retinopathy in 1979.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    15. Cheryl Seibert

      I was diagnosed with a diabetic ‘snowflake’ cataract this past year after 55 years of T1D. Cataracts also run in my family with both my mother and father requiring them to be removed (neither parent was diabetic). Not sure the cataract is diabetic-related but I did develop it 10 years sooner than my parents. Some of it could be genetic and environment (working in an extremely hot office resulting in my eyes drying out to the point of inflammation). A1C has always been below 7 although my BGs wildly rise and fall (brittle diabetic used to be the term).

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    16. Karen Milton

      Had adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) after 20 years, cataract surgery in both eyes after about 35 years, and coronary artery disease after 55 years.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    17. Nicholas Argento

      10-19, but that was in 1980, retinopathy and proteinuria (early kidney injury) present after 12 years – but that was prior to fingersticks. First A1c I ever had was around 10 in 1979 or so. Since early 1982, A1c’s have been averaging around 6.5, last 5 years 6.2. And the retinopathy (background, minimal not vision threatening) never progressed, and the protein in the urine went away.—————– Punchline- good BG control WORKS. It is work, but it works. It saves lives and preserves health.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    18. Molly Jones

      After ten years I developed frozen shoulder, but it improved greatly then resolved after physical therapy. It was quite interesting to use your non dominant hand for things requiring dexterity. I didn’t think brushing my teeth would be so difficult at first.
      Two years after that I had my first DKA, most likely due to neurosurgery. ‘Just had a short hospital stay.
      I have had life long problems with digestion that I never saw a doctor for, but after being diagnosed with T1D it is now listed as gastroparesis due to T1D. ?!

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    19. ConnieT1D62

      Had my first dilated eye exam in 1981 – almost 20 years after being diagnosed at age 9 and a life time of inaccurate urine testing and an inconsistent course of one or two shots of NPH or Lente insulin a day. I had background retinopathy that was edging toward being proliferative, and since I wanted to get pregnant, the endo team I was seeing advised me to get my eyes treated NOW (then) and work toward getting my BG stabilized using CHO counting, MDI and home BG monitoring. In 1981-82 had a series of lasers in both eyes, and was sent to The Diabetes Self-Care Program in NYC where I really learned to live with my diabetes by counting carbs, monitoring my BGs and doing my best to avoid rollercoaster episodes of hypo/hyperglycemia. It was the early days home glucose monitoring with an Ames glucometer. Up to that point I had no idea what my BG were doing.

      My eyes stabilized with the laser treatments in 1982 and have been quiet ever since with no further retinopathy. Eventually over the course of time, I developed frozen shoulder in my mid-30s, overt symptoms of peripheral neuropathy in my hands and feet in my mid-40s, and pronounced osteopenia leading to stress fractures and Charcot osteo-arthropathy changes in my feet in my early 50s.

      Nobody ever mentioned or talked about any of these subtle or progressive neuropathic changes in my hands and feet until they were quite advanced and had been mislabeled and misdiagnosed by several MDs that I consulted. Finally an astute orthopedic physician performed an MRI and determined that I had early stages of Charcot osteo-arthropathy in my R foot and I was able to receive appropriate treatment to keep it from progressing. His excuse for the months of misdiagnosis on behalf of his colleagues was, “We aren’t used to seeing it this early”, and he relayed that usually they see a Charcot foot that looks like a swollen football with collapsed boney deformities and open ulcers. That was not what my foot looked like – originally I was diagnosed with sprain/strain injury and tendonitis, and over a period of four months my foot was not healing the way it needed to heal. Long story short, once the problem was properly diagnosed for what it was, appropriate treatment and preventive care was initiated and my foot healed, albeit with some residual deformity. I now wear sensible shoes with custom inserts and my feet are healthy and functional.

      The comorbid conditions that can happen over a lifetime with T1D are insidious and progressive. They can occur at any time and are often missed or mistaken for something else. For example, it’s not about getting a gangrene infected toe or foot from a blister – more likely the ligaments and boney structure in the foot of a fairly active person (like a runner, or a mailman, or a nurse, an athlete, dancer, truck driver, etc) with advanced duration diabetes has sustained a stress fracture injury and because of neuropathy does not feel the warning sign pain signals and continues to walk, run, climb stairs, do whatever they do on a daily basis.

      We must all learn to pay attention to the subtle physical change warning signals in our bodies – and face the fact that we are vulnerable to challenging comorbid conditions (I hate using the word “complications” to refer to these conditions that can occur due to diabetes – I prefer to call them “comorbid challenges”).

      Face it PWDs – they happen. We all live in challenged bodies. It doesn’t make you less of a person or “a bad diabetic” to have retinopathy, or neuropathy, or progressive kidney changes, or Charcot feet. You have not failed and it is not the end of the world. Our bodies age and fall apart the more fully we live life – and we all know that living life with T1D makes us more more prone to up and down outcomes and is a super challenge for all of us. I joyfully celebrate the fact that several us have made it into our senior years having lived with T1D for 30, 40, 50, 60 plus years – and we keep on truckin’.

      Thank you for taking the time to read this “diatribe”. Hopefully these words will serve to help someone facing comorbid challenges.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    20. Marie Seymour-Green

      Trigger finger and frozen shoulder – not something like major organ damage.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    21. Jneticdiabetic

      I was developed frozen shoulder a few years ago, about 23 yrs post my T1D diagnosis. I actually didn’t know that was considered a diabetes complication until seeing related questions in this forum!
      I was diagnosed with Hashimoto’s and had other joint issues in the years following the birth of my kids (~15 yrs post T1D). Diagnosed with dry eyes this year. Other autoimmune/feisty immune system challenges, rather than complications?
      I’m current 26 yrs post diagnosis. Luckily, none of the classic complications yet.
      Nice to hear everyone’s experiences, successes and perseverance!

      5 years ago Log in to Reply

    If you have at least one diabetes-related complication, for how many years had you been living with T1D when you were diagnosed with the first complication? Cancel reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.




    101 Federal Street, Suite 440
    Boston, MA 02110
    Phone: 617-892-6100
    Email: admin@t1dexchange.org

    Privacy Policy

    Terms of Use

    Follow Us

    • facebook
    • twitter
    • linkedin
    • instagram

    © 2024 T1D Exchange.
    All Rights Reserved.

    © 2023 T1D Exchange. All Rights Reserved.
    • Login
    • Register

    Forgot Password

    Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

    Skip Next Finish

    Account successfully created.

    Please check your inbox and verify your email in the next 24 hours.

    Your Account Type

    Please select all that apply.

    I have type 1 diabetes

    I'm a parent/guardian of a person with type 1 diabetes

    I'm interested in the diabetes community or industry

    Select Topics

    We will customize your stories feed based on what you select here.

    [userselectcat]

    We're preparing your personalized page.

    This will only take a second...

    Search and filter

    [searchandfilter slug="sort-filter-post"]