Subscribe Now

[hb-subscribe]

Trending News

T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
  • Activity
    • 54 minutes ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 54 minutes ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 55 minutes ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Sorry. I'm not sold on AI. I don't trust the people making it. There are too many reasons it could go wrong and be disasterous (just read the above comments). I'm not opposed to computers helping with things such as Control IQ, but when the computer starts doing the thinking, I think we've crossed the line. An aside: I've listened to AI music, and I think it sounds impersonal. It lacks a humanness. I don't find it pleasant to listen to. I've heard horror stories about AI being used by the military, with the end result being nuclear holocaust. I am a hard NO to AI. I gave it a "5".
    • 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 1 hour, 36 minutes ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 1 hour, 38 minutes ago
      Mike S likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 2 hours ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      Do you have a management plan if you test positive for ketones? Please share more in the comments.
      Sure, if you can call it a plan to flush with liquids and take electrolytes and insulin as needed.
    • 2 hours, 1 minute ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      Do you have a management plan if you test positive for ketones? Please share more in the comments.
      Inject. Inject. Inject. All other considerations are secondary, tertiary, or way down the list. Why would anyone ever rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic? Might as well strike up the band to play Nearer My God to Thee!. ☹
    • 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 2 hours, 2 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      Do you have a management plan if you test positive for ketones? Please share more in the comments.
      It would depend on the symptoms and vary.
    • 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 2 hours, 4 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 2 hours, 4 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      2 It already is. But needs to be checked occasionally. I don't want a person inside me every five minutes.
    • 2 hours, 7 minutes ago
      KCR likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 2 hours, 13 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 2 hours, 21 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 2 hours, 30 minutes ago
      KSannie likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 2 hours, 31 minutes ago
      Gerald Oefelein likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 2 hours, 32 minutes ago
      Gerald Oefelein likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 2 hours, 41 minutes ago
      Judith Halterman likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 2 hours, 42 minutes ago
      Judith Halterman likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I’m uncomfortable not knowing when and when it isn’t being used, but I’m not sure why really. A “singer” named Benny Rivers popped up in one of my feeds. I really liked the music, until I found out it was a total AI fabrication. Then I was uncomfortable. Why? I felt “taken”, like someone pulled a fast one on me, pulled the wool over my eyes. I liked the music less then. I didn’t like that I couldn’t find a tour date, things like that. But I was most uncomfortable not truly understanding why it made me uncomfortable. The music was still enjoyable.
    • 1 day ago
      atr likes your comment at
      Do you have a management plan if you test positive for ketones? Please share more in the comments.
      If I had ketones thrn I am sick. If mid to large I wd call my endo or if also vomiting or dehydrated from diarrhea. I wd go to the ER
    • 1 day, 1 hour ago
      Marty likes your comment at
      Do you have a management plan if you test positive for ketones? Please share more in the comments.
      If I were not feeling too bad, I would change my site, increase my insulin, drink more water and monitor closely
    Clear All
Pages
    • T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
    • Articles
    • Community
      • About
      • Insights
      • T1D Screening
        • T1D Screening How-To
        • T1D Screening Results
        • T1D Screening Resources
      • Donate
      • Join the Community
    • Quality Improvement
      • About
      • Collaborative
        • Leadership
        • Committees
      • Centers
      • Meet the Experts
      • Learning Sessions
      • Resources
        • Change Packages
        • Sick Day Guide
        • FOH Screener
        • T1D Care Plans
      • Portal
      • Health Equity
        • Heal Advisors
    • Registry
      • About
      • Recruit for the Registry
    • Research
      • About
      • Publications
      • COVID-19 Research
      • Our Initiatives
    • Partnerships
      • About
      • Industry Partnerships
      • Academic Partnerships
      • Previous Work
    • About
      • Team
      • Board of Directors
      • Culture & Careers
      • Annual Report
    • Join / Login
    • Search
    • Donate

    If you currently use both an insulin pump and CGM, do you use any of the following automated insulin delivery (also known as “closed-loop”) algorithms to help keep your glucose in-range?

    Home > LC Polls > If you currently use both an insulin pump and CGM, do you use any of the following automated insulin delivery (also known as “closed-loop”) algorithms to help keep your glucose in-range?
    Previous

    Have you ever had to evacuate your home due to a natural disaster while living with T1D? If so, share any resources or info that helped you in the comments.

    Next

    Have you ever used expired glucose strips? If so, share in the comments whether you noticed any differences from unexpired strips.

    Sarah Howard

    Sarah Howard has worked in the diabetes research field ever since she was diagnosed with T1D while in college in May 2013. Since then, she has worked for various diabetes organizations, focusing on research, advocacy, and community-building efforts for people with T1D and their loved ones. Sarah is currently the Senior Marketing Manager at T1D Exchange.

    Related Stories

    " At T1D Exchange, we’re proud to announce our Medical and Research Advisory Team — an accomplished group of leaders in endocrinology, research, and quality improvement. Together, they are redefining what’s possible in type 1 diabetes (T1D) care through rigorous data analysis, innovative research approaches, and real-world implementation. Their collective expertise is central to our mission of improving outcomes for all people living with T1D.  “We’re excited to be working with our advisors given their deep expertise across a broad range of areas in T1D,” said Dave Walton, CEO of T1D Exchange. “Their involvement magnifies our reach, knowledge, and impact. These advisors are shaping the future of diabetes care — driving innovation across research, clinical practice, and quality improvement.”    Meet the Medical & Research Advisory Team  The T1D Exchange Medical and Research Advisory Team brings together four leading endocrinologists, each offering a unique perspective and shared commitment to advancing T1D care:    Jenise Wong, MD, PhD Pediatric endocrinologist at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at the University of California, San Francisco Focus areas: Diabetes technology adoption and usability; health equity and access to care and technology; community-based and peer-support interventions; culturally responsive care          Jennifer Sherr, MD, PhD Pediatric endocrinologist at Yale Medicine and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut Focus areas: Clinical trials in diabetes technology (CGM and AID systems), disease-modifying treatments and immunotherapies, and emerging technologies and medications, including continuous ketone monitoring and nasal glucagon     Viral Shah, MD Adult endocrinologist at Indiana University Health and Professor of Medicine in the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism at Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis, Indiana Focus areas: Diabetes technology and adjunctive therapy trials; translational and data-driven research; T1D complications and bone health         Nestoras Mathioudakis, MD, MHS Adult endocrinologist at Johns Hopkins Medicine and Associate Professor of Medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland Focus areas: AI-driven clinical support tools; EMR-based data analytics for clinical decision making; data-driven quality improvement; health equity in T1D care        This accomplished team’s expertise spans adult and pediatric endocrinology, research, and quality improvement affiliated with leading institutions nationwide. Collectively, they have authored over 500 diabetes publications and secured research funding from organizations such as the National Institutes of Health, Helmsley Charitable Trust, the American Diabetes Association, and Breakthrough T1D — while remaining actively engaged in both clinical care and research.  “These individuals represent an impressive body of work while remaining deeply involved in the day-to-day realities of diabetes care,” said Walton. Their expertise covers the full spectrum of T1D care — from AI and predictive analytics to complication prevention, automated insulin delivery, continuous glucose and ketone monitoring, GLP-1 treatments, health equity, mental health, autoantibody screening, and disease prevention.    Turning insight into impact  The team’s work goes beyond research, focusing on translating insights into real-world practice. By leveraging data to scale best practices, the goal is to drive meaningful, measurable change across clinics and communities.  “Our advisors will help to extend our impact — whether through QI strategy, research innovation, funding opportunities, or new data-driven solutions,” said Walton. “We want to take what’s working at individual centers and spread that as broadly as possible.”   He added, “As a Collaborative, we’re also focused on advanced population health strategies such as exploring predictive data models to identify risks earlier and intervene before complications even begin to happen.”    The power of the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative  Central to this work is the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative (T1DX-QI) — a nationwide network of clinics working together to improve care through shared data, benchmarking, and evidence-based practices.  “I’m thrilled to serve as a Medical Advisor for T1D Exchange, because I’ve seen firsthand the impact this network can have on patient care,” said Dr. Nestoras Mathioudakis. “T1D Exchange is the premier organization for quality improvement in type 1 diabetes, with unparalleled assets like a large EHR database and robust patient registry.”  He added that he is excited to apply his expertise in EHR research and big data analytics to generate real-world evidence across diagnosis, management, and outcomes.  Dr. Viral Shah echoed that perspective, reflecting on T1DX-QI's evolution: “I have been involved with T1D Exchange since its early days and have had the privilege of witnessing how it has transformed the quality of diabetes care across the United States. I’m delighted to return as a Medical Advisor.”  He emphasized the importance of accelerating impact. “I look forward to working closely with the team to accelerate the evidence generation and to help translate these insights to improve patient care.”   Dr. Jenise Wong highlighted the visible impact of T1DX-QI on the delivery of care. "I’m truly honored and grateful to be working with T1D Exchange as a Medical Advisor. T1DX-QI is a remarkable resource for centers that are using continuous process improvement to improve the quality of care for people living with diabetes.”  “Diabetes centers working with T1DX –QI have done amazing work using QI methodology to make care accessible and equitable for all people with diabetes,” she said. “It’s inspiring to be a part of a collaborative in which centers have been creative and thoughtful with initiatives to address individual and systemic challenges to care, improving clinical outcomes as well as the patient experience."  Looking ahead, Dr. Sherr highlighted the opportunity to build on the existing strong foundation. “I’m very excited to be working as a Medical Advisor for T1D Exchange,” she said. “It’s a privilege to help shape what comes next for a group that’s already doing such impactful work.”  “Sharing what’s happening in clinical practice, benchmarking across centers, and understanding outcomes is how we figure out what’s working, what’s not, and where we go next,” she said.      The future of T1D care   With this team’s vision and expertise, T1D Exchange is positioned to accelerate progress in T1D care — bridging research and real-world practice to drive meaningful, measurable impact.  Together, we look forward to advancing innovation and improving outcomes for everyone affected by type 1 diabetes.   "

    2 days ago  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Improving Diabetes Care Through Precision Medicine 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 week ago 8 min read  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Bridging Research, Technology, and Real-World Care 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 week ago 9 min read  
    Insulin & Meds

    Ask the Expert: Diana Isaacs on Benefits, Risks, and Real-World Use of GLP-1s in T1D 

    Jewels Doskicz, 2 weeks ago 6 min read  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Advancing Equity, Improving Outcomes, and Reducing the Burden of T1D 

    Jewels Doskicz, 4 weeks ago 8 min read  
    Our team

    Spotlight on T1DX-QI: Clinical Leadership Committee 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 month ago 6 min read  

    28 Comments

    1. Brenda Pronschinske

      Meftronic system (smart guard) raised my A1C!
      It’s set to keep your blood sugar at 150! Aargh! There is no changing that so therefore I no longer use SmartGuard, not until Medtronic lowers the base rate to 100 but I’m afraid they are too late, better sensors and pumps out there now !

      6
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. William Bennett

        I had the same result and the same complaint. So I went back to my old pager-style paradigm and Dexcom G6, which I prefer hugely over the Guardian CGM. I’m due for a replacement pump since back in March, but I’m down on the whole algorithm concept. If it works for you, great, but for those of us who already achieve tight control they can end up feeling like a straightjacket.

        3
        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    2. Lawrence Stearns

      I’m using Tandem X2, with Dexcom G6, and the Control-IQ system. Works very well. Set my own blood sugar level at 115. I wake up every morning between about 97 to 110, mostly 104.

      3
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Jneticdiabetic

        Wow! Now that’s precise!

        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    3. Larry Martin

      Medtronic Smartguard does not work for highs so I only use the low suspend. This thing should have never been released because my time in range is worse in Auto Mode. Basal units stop after a mealtime bolus and you end up so high the dribbles of insulin can not correct for usually 6 hours. I achieve 90% in range on my own so I stopped using Auto Mode.

      5
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    4. David Smith

      I tried Medtronic Guardian but wasn’t impressed with either the algorithm or the sensor. Switched to Medtronic pump + Dexcom, entering my own boluses, but plan to change pumps to automate the process once my Medtronic warranty is up.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    5. Nevin Bowman

      I have a Medtronic pump and switched to a Dexcom cgm because Medtronic’s was worthless. So, I can’t do any automated deliveries, but I had stopped before then anyway as Medtronic’s algorithms are not accurate.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    6. Joan McGinnis

      I use tandem control IQ and dexcom g6. Just switched from basal in and was hesitant to give up the control I had over this but have found out that the algorithm is good and an endo who really understands well and communicates well is the best combination

      3
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    7. kristina blake

      I use the Tandem/Dexcom G6 BIQ. I am quite aggressive in my Y1D mgt, and the CIQ targets are too high for me. With BIQ I still have temp basal I can use, lots of micro-dosing and I can correct when I deem it appropriate. While I hear that CIQ does tale a lot of the drudgery away for many people, I guess my preference to have my foot on the accelerator/brake pedals suits my personality better.

      3
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    8. Mig Vascos

      I agree with many of the responders that the Medtronic sensors are worthless. They drove me crazy and was still checking 8-10 times daily while I used them.
      I went back to Dexcom starting with the G4. I’ve been on Tandem Control IQ for about a year and a half.
      I keep it on the Sleep Mode all the time. The goal on this mode is lower than the regular mode. The system works perfectly during the night. It’s a real blessing.
      During the day it’s not as great. I find there is a problem when it stops the basal at 112 and then later it falls short when you eat and then the bolus doesn’t cover the BG spike. So I turn the Control IQ off during the day at times so that if my bg is between 90 and 112 I don’t want my insulin to be stopped and get a high later on.
      As I said before is great at night when you are not eating or exercising. I’m grateful for a good night sleep.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    9. BOB FISK

      Since I turned 65 and retired several years ago, my health insurance has been a Medicare Plus situation. I use a Medtronic pump, but Medicare only approves the Dexcom CGM system, and the Medtronic sensors are much too expensive for me to purchase. So, I am the robotic link between the pump and the CGM.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    10. Jneticdiabetic

      Previously used Medtronic pump with Dexcom 4 CGM. A few years ago switched to the Medtronic Smartguard (670G) because it was the first and only “closed loop” option on the market at the time. I find I have greater time in range while in auto mode. It especially helps me avoid lows. I went hiking this weekend without any lows, manual suspends, or frantic carb ingestion needed, which is rare for me. While the Medtronic’s CGM technology has improved in recent years, I’d agree that the Dexcom CGM is much more user friendly (simple application, no blasted tape, no charging of transmitters, and fewer nonsense alarms). Switching from injections to a Medtronic pump on 2000 probably saved my life (in terms of avoiding severe lows), so I’ll always be grateful. But when my warranty comes up I’ll be researching all my options.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. RobbyLee

        I was a loyal to Medtronic for many years (1999 -2020), but found their technology was lacking compared to other companies. I finally took the leap, and switched to Dexcom CGM with the Tandem control IQ pump. There are some user differences (ie, you but don’t need to use batteries but do need to charge the pump every 2-3 days, and some other more minor differences), but overall, it’s been a very positive experience for me. My control has markedly improved, and those blasted calibration errors on the 670G system are becoming a mere memory!

        2
        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    11. Bob Durstenfeld

      I love the Dexcom G6 with the Tandem’s Control IQ. It definitely lowers the mental management load. And like others, I love waking up to a BG between 100 and 110. It makes the day run much smoother.

      8
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    12. Karen Brady

      I’ve been on Dex since 2015 and Omnipod since 2017. Just started Looping with a RileyLink in March. It’s not nearly as great as I’d hoped but it’s helped with overnight lows, and when it doesn’t lose connection at night I wake up with an in-range number which, as others mentioned, is huge. I wish there was a “smarter” system out there that learned our bodies’ patterns and was less prone to user error.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    13. Janis Senungetuk

      I’ve been using a Tandem t:slim X2 with the Control IQ app for the past year +. I’m very happy with the results.

      3
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    14. Maureen Helinski

      I love the Tandem IQ/Dexcom G6 combination. I even forget I am diabetic sometimes and begin to eat. My A1c has been 6.1 for a year or so.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    15. Kathryn Keller

      My daughter uses loop. We were originally on tandem, but she was too young when Control iq came out so, we decided to try Loop. She loves the omnipod now, so doesn’t want to go back. It is nice that I can set overrides from home when she is at school to try to keep her in range.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    16. Bonnie Lundblom

      I use the Tslimx2 pump and the Dexcom 6 but because my Dexcom readings are frequently so inaccurate Tandem told me I can’t use any of the algorithms. I’ve talked to Dexcom many times about this and they recently told me that the CGM 7 will have differences with the sensor that may help. I’m thin and have read a few comments on this site from parents with small children describing problems with accuracy. I’m not sure how long Medicare will wait to change all of us on the 6 over to the 7.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. KSannie

        I am thin, BMI 20.5, but have no problems with the Dexcom being accurate.

        1
        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    17. Rebecca Lambert

      I previously used Medtronic closed loop, but was not happy with the higher targets used by the algorithm.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    18. Adam Wright

      On omnipod dash so waiting for the overlord FDA to allow Insulet to release their loop system.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    19. Isis Gregory

      I have a 670g. Tried auto mode for a few months. I think I do a better job myself so I don’t use it.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    20. Becky Hertz

      I use Tandem t: slim and Dexcom G6 but neither CIQ or BIQ. As others have said, the Dexcom isn’t as accurate for me as I’d like in order to go hybrid closed loop. My biggest issues are in the low end where my bg is frequently lower than the Dex reading. 20 points (not percent) might not make a difference above 100, but is quite more significant the lower one gets.

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    21. Brandon Denson

      I have used algorithms and open APS before.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    22. BARRY HUNSINGER

      I used to use the Medtronic auto mode system. I found it to be extremely annoying with all the alerts etc. It also kept my BG higher the 120. When I transferred to Medicare I found they don’t pay for Medtronics CGMs. It took six months to get approved for the Dexcom 6 CGMs, they don’t work with the Medtronic 670g pump.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Nicole Alexander

        Agree Medtronic auto mode keeps my sugars elevated too, I hate the alerts.

        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    23. Tom Riffe

      Love my Loop App, 2007 Medtronic Pump with Fiasp Insulin, Dexcom G6, Riley Link that adjusts basal every 5 minutes to bring me towards my target of 100. Don’t love you need a Mac to download Loop app on iphone once a year.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply

    If you currently use both an insulin pump and CGM, do you use any of the following automated insulin delivery (also known as “closed-loop”) algorithms to help keep your glucose in-range? Cancel reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.




    101 Federal Street, Suite 440
    Boston, MA 02110
    Phone: 617-892-6100
    Email: admin@t1dexchange.org

    Privacy Policy

    Terms of Use

    Follow Us

    • facebook
    • twitter
    • linkedin
    • instagram

    © 2024 T1D Exchange.
    All Rights Reserved.

    © 2023 T1D Exchange. All Rights Reserved.
    • Login
    • Register

    Forgot Password

    Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

    Skip Next Finish

    Account successfully created.

    Please check your inbox and verify your email in the next 24 hours.

    Your Account Type

    Please select all that apply.

    I have type 1 diabetes

    I'm a parent/guardian of a person with type 1 diabetes

    I'm interested in the diabetes community or industry

    Select Topics

    We will customize your stories feed based on what you select here.

    [userselectcat]

    We're preparing your personalized page.

    This will only take a second...

    Search and filter

    [searchandfilter slug="sort-filter-post"]