Subscribe Now

[hb-subscribe]

Trending News

T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
  • Activity
    • 38 minutes ago
      D-connect likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      I have an MA in writing and lit, but gobbledegook is gobbledegook. The fancy term is obscurantism.
    • 39 minutes ago
      D-connect likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      They change all the time. Generally not in a direction to improve my health, but to increase the money in their wallet.
    • 40 minutes ago
      D-connect likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 1 hour, 28 minutes ago
      Ahh Life likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      I have an MA in writing and lit, but gobbledegook is gobbledegook. The fancy term is obscurantism.
    • 1 hour, 29 minutes ago
      Ahh Life likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      Extremely. I have a certificate in Medical Billing & Coding.
    • 5 hours, 8 minutes ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      "Slightly," I think, maybe. Insurance companies change their policies, constantly. Prescription coverage changes every time I look at it. Medicare is a huge question mark. Honestly, Health insurance has become a big money making business, for them. I get different answers every time I call, depending upon whom I am talking with. I say it's time for socialized medicine.
    • 5 hours, 9 minutes ago
      atr likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 5 hours, 21 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Roughly half my lows are caused by my auto correct system now. I expect AI hallucinations to make it worse. I have enough hallucinations when I'm low and need non-hallucinatory help. We all need more info on this subject to make better decisions. As my favorite 80's AI robot (Johnny 5) said, "Need input."
    • 5 hours, 22 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I'm not comfortable for many reasons: 1) AI hasn't proven respects boundaries, quite the opposite, too many reports of AI tend to view its responsibilities and decisions as NOT mine; 2) the companies behind AI systems do likewise in not respecting my data as mine and jumble it in with their own; 3) AI systems haven't proven themselves as reliable parties regarding data and actions. There are many more; AI systems have a long way to go before I entrust one with dosing strategies while I'm awake, let alone while I'm asleep!
    • 5 hours, 22 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I’ve done a large 2 week focus group through Syracuse University on AI. I’ve also been watching shows on European news about AI and medical issues. AI still has too many glitches when it comes to medical issues.
    • 5 hours, 38 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 5 hours, 44 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Having recently dealt with ongoing tech issues involving our heat and electrical-use notifications for more than six months — and it’s still not fully resolved — I’m not always a fan of too much technology. That said, I am interested in advances like the Twist Insulin Pump potentially detecting scar tissue or helping with infusion-site issues. But then reality kicks in: taking devices off for MRIs, replacing failed equipment, and navigating Medicare when it’s primary insurance can become a nightmare of paperwork and delays. And honestly, AI in some call centers has been pretty frustrating. Sometimes it feels like no one can answer a real-world question anymore. I think we should tread lightly and make sure technology actually makes life easier for people living with T1D — especially older adults who already manage enough complexity every day. Some days I think about a less stress free life and going back to a syringe and insulin. over 45 years of doing that, and now 25+ of devices, I'm tired of the challenges in getting replacements, and scar tissue, and mail order supplies and on and on.
    • 5 hours, 55 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 1 day, 1 hour ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all technical advancements there are good things and bad things. The bad things (unforseen consequences) could be deadly like Hallucinations for the user, getting over doses of insulin. So, carefully thought out guard rails need to be developed and thoroughly tested. A good thing must be the accumulation of scenarios that KSannie mentioned. However it can not be completely autonomous. The current accuracy of Dex G7 and other sensors introduce error in to the calculations. This is similar to "self driving cars." The Robo taxi experiments have shown the unusual events that could become dangerous. Either audible situation commands or textual inputs like "goin to bed" or "driving" or "exercising" may be required at the beginning for a new user. As an example, after wearing my smart watch for a year now, it recognizes exercising without me having to tell it I'm exercising. This drives a more advanced and improved user interface. The other perceivable advantage might be accumulating changes over time, such as sicknesses, weight gain or loss, or changes in activity. Changes in food intake might be difficult to overcome. Something like "Under my Fork" app. Personally, I would like to see a reminder to bolis before eating! With all that said, we do we need all that? Probably not. Evolution of modified closed loop control may eliminate the need for AI control. The reality may be somewhere in-between the two.
    • 1 day, 1 hour ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 1 day, 1 hour ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I’m uncomfortable not knowing when and when it isn’t being used, but I’m not sure why really. A “singer” named Benny Rivers popped up in one of my feeds. I really liked the music, until I found out it was a total AI fabrication. Then I was uncomfortable. Why? I felt “taken”, like someone pulled a fast one on me, pulled the wool over my eyes. I liked the music less then. I didn’t like that I couldn’t find a tour date, things like that. But I was most uncomfortable not truly understanding why it made me uncomfortable. The music was still enjoyable.
    • 1 day, 3 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Having recently dealt with ongoing tech issues involving our heat and electrical-use notifications for more than six months — and it’s still not fully resolved — I’m not always a fan of too much technology. That said, I am interested in advances like the Twist Insulin Pump potentially detecting scar tissue or helping with infusion-site issues. But then reality kicks in: taking devices off for MRIs, replacing failed equipment, and navigating Medicare when it’s primary insurance can become a nightmare of paperwork and delays. And honestly, AI in some call centers has been pretty frustrating. Sometimes it feels like no one can answer a real-world question anymore. I think we should tread lightly and make sure technology actually makes life easier for people living with T1D — especially older adults who already manage enough complexity every day. Some days I think about a less stress free life and going back to a syringe and insulin. over 45 years of doing that, and now 25+ of devices, I'm tired of the challenges in getting replacements, and scar tissue, and mail order supplies and on and on.
    • 1 day, 3 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all technical advancements there are good things and bad things. The bad things (unforseen consequences) could be deadly like Hallucinations for the user, getting over doses of insulin. So, carefully thought out guard rails need to be developed and thoroughly tested. A good thing must be the accumulation of scenarios that KSannie mentioned. However it can not be completely autonomous. The current accuracy of Dex G7 and other sensors introduce error in to the calculations. This is similar to "self driving cars." The Robo taxi experiments have shown the unusual events that could become dangerous. Either audible situation commands or textual inputs like "goin to bed" or "driving" or "exercising" may be required at the beginning for a new user. As an example, after wearing my smart watch for a year now, it recognizes exercising without me having to tell it I'm exercising. This drives a more advanced and improved user interface. The other perceivable advantage might be accumulating changes over time, such as sicknesses, weight gain or loss, or changes in activity. Changes in food intake might be difficult to overcome. Something like "Under my Fork" app. Personally, I would like to see a reminder to bolis before eating! With all that said, we do we need all that? Probably not. Evolution of modified closed loop control may eliminate the need for AI control. The reality may be somewhere in-between the two.
    • 1 day, 3 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Sorry. I'm not sold on AI. I don't trust the people making it. There are too many reasons it could go wrong and be disasterous (just read the above comments). I'm not opposed to computers helping with things such as Control IQ, but when the computer starts doing the thinking, I think we've crossed the line. An aside: I've listened to AI music, and I think it sounds impersonal. It lacks a humanness. I don't find it pleasant to listen to. I've heard horror stories about AI being used by the military, with the end result being nuclear holocaust. I am a hard NO to AI. I gave it a "5".
    • 1 day, 3 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 1 day, 4 hours ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 1 day, 4 hours ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 1 day, 4 hours ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 1 day, 4 hours ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Sorry. I'm not sold on AI. I don't trust the people making it. There are too many reasons it could go wrong and be disasterous (just read the above comments). I'm not opposed to computers helping with things such as Control IQ, but when the computer starts doing the thinking, I think we've crossed the line. An aside: I've listened to AI music, and I think it sounds impersonal. It lacks a humanness. I don't find it pleasant to listen to. I've heard horror stories about AI being used by the military, with the end result being nuclear holocaust. I am a hard NO to AI. I gave it a "5".
    • 1 day, 4 hours ago
      John Barbuto likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    Clear All
Pages
    • T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
    • Articles
    • Community
      • About
      • Insights
      • T1D Screening
        • T1D Screening How-To
        • T1D Screening Results
        • T1D Screening Resources
      • Donate
      • Join the Community
    • Quality Improvement
      • About
      • Collaborative
        • Leadership
        • Committees
      • Centers
      • Meet the Experts
      • Learning Sessions
      • Resources
        • Change Packages
        • Sick Day Guide
        • FOH Screener
        • T1D Care Plans
      • Portal
      • Health Equity
        • Heal Advisors
    • Registry
      • About
      • Recruit for the Registry
    • Research
      • About
      • Publications
      • COVID-19 Research
      • Our Initiatives
    • Partnerships
      • About
      • Industry Partnerships
      • Academic Partnerships
      • Previous Work
    • About
      • Team
      • Board of Directors
      • Culture & Careers
      • Annual Report
    • Join / Login
    • Search
    • Donate

    Have you had to pay out of pocket for back up T1D-related supplies?

    Home > LC Polls > Have you had to pay out of pocket for back up T1D-related supplies?
    Previous

    Has the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) ever asked if you’re insulin dependent when obtaining or renewing a driver's license?

    Next

    When you go away for the weekend (2 nights), how many low snacks do you bring with you?

    Samantha Walsh

    Samantha Walsh has lived with type 1 diabetes for over five years since 2017. After her T1D diagnosis, she was eager to give back to the diabetes community. She is the Community and Partner Manager for T1D Exchange and helps to manage the Online Community and recruit for the T1D Exchange Registry. Prior to T1D Exchange, Samantha fundraised at Joslin Diabetes Center. She graduated from the University of Massachusetts with a Bachelors degree in sociology and early childhood education.

    Related Stories

    " At T1D Exchange, we’re proud to announce our Medical and Research Advisory Team — an accomplished group of leaders in endocrinology, research, and quality improvement. Together, they are redefining what’s possible in type 1 diabetes (T1D) care through rigorous data analysis, innovative research approaches, and real-world implementation. Their collective expertise is central to our mission of improving outcomes for all people living with T1D.  “We’re excited to be working with our advisors given their deep expertise across a broad range of areas in T1D,” said Dave Walton, CEO of T1D Exchange. “Their involvement magnifies our reach, knowledge, and impact. These advisors are shaping the future of diabetes care — driving innovation across research, clinical practice, and quality improvement.”    Meet the Medical & Research Advisory Team  The T1D Exchange Medical and Research Advisory Team brings together four leading endocrinologists, each offering a unique perspective and shared commitment to advancing T1D care:    Jenise Wong, MD, PhD Pediatric endocrinologist at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at the University of California, San Francisco Focus areas: Diabetes technology adoption and usability; health equity and access to care and technology; community-based and peer-support interventions; culturally responsive care          Jennifer Sherr, MD, PhD Pediatric endocrinologist at Yale Medicine and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut Focus areas: Clinical trials in diabetes technology (CGM and AID systems), disease-modifying treatments and immunotherapies, and emerging technologies and medications, including continuous ketone monitoring and nasal glucagon     Viral Shah, MD Adult endocrinologist at Indiana University Health and Professor of Medicine in the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism at Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis, Indiana Focus areas: Diabetes technology and adjunctive therapy trials; translational and data-driven research; T1D complications and bone health         Nestoras Mathioudakis, MD, MHS Adult endocrinologist at Johns Hopkins Medicine and Associate Professor of Medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland Focus areas: AI-driven clinical support tools; EMR-based data analytics for clinical decision making; data-driven quality improvement; health equity in T1D care        This accomplished team’s expertise spans adult and pediatric endocrinology, research, and quality improvement affiliated with leading institutions nationwide. Collectively, they have authored over 500 diabetes publications and secured research funding from organizations such as the National Institutes of Health, Helmsley Charitable Trust, the American Diabetes Association, and Breakthrough T1D — while remaining actively engaged in both clinical care and research.  “These individuals represent an impressive body of work while remaining deeply involved in the day-to-day realities of diabetes care,” said Walton. Their expertise covers the full spectrum of T1D care — from AI and predictive analytics to complication prevention, automated insulin delivery, continuous glucose and ketone monitoring, GLP-1 treatments, health equity, mental health, autoantibody screening, and disease prevention.    Turning insight into impact  The team’s work goes beyond research, focusing on translating insights into real-world practice. By leveraging data to scale best practices, the goal is to drive meaningful, measurable change across clinics and communities.  “Our advisors will help to extend our impact — whether through QI strategy, research innovation, funding opportunities, or new data-driven solutions,” said Walton. “We want to take what’s working at individual centers and spread that as broadly as possible.”   He added, “As a Collaborative, we’re also focused on advanced population health strategies such as exploring predictive data models to identify risks earlier and intervene before complications even begin to happen.”    The power of the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative  Central to this work is the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative (T1DX-QI) — a nationwide network of clinics working together to improve care through shared data, benchmarking, and evidence-based practices.  “I’m thrilled to serve as a Medical Advisor for T1D Exchange, because I’ve seen firsthand the impact this network can have on patient care,” said Dr. Nestoras Mathioudakis. “T1D Exchange is the premier organization for quality improvement in type 1 diabetes, with unparalleled assets like a large EHR database and robust patient registry.”  He added that he is excited to apply his expertise in EHR research and big data analytics to generate real-world evidence across diagnosis, management, and outcomes.  Dr. Viral Shah echoed that perspective, reflecting on T1DX-QI's evolution: “I have been involved with T1D Exchange since its early days and have had the privilege of witnessing how it has transformed the quality of diabetes care across the United States. I’m delighted to return as a Medical Advisor.”  He emphasized the importance of accelerating impact. “I look forward to working closely with the team to accelerate the evidence generation and to help translate these insights to improve patient care.”   Dr. Jenise Wong highlighted the visible impact of T1DX-QI on the delivery of care. "I’m truly honored and grateful to be working with T1D Exchange as a Medical Advisor. T1DX-QI is a remarkable resource for centers that are using continuous process improvement to improve the quality of care for people living with diabetes.”  “Diabetes centers working with T1DX –QI have done amazing work using QI methodology to make care accessible and equitable for all people with diabetes,” she said. “It’s inspiring to be a part of a collaborative in which centers have been creative and thoughtful with initiatives to address individual and systemic challenges to care, improving clinical outcomes as well as the patient experience."  Looking ahead, Dr. Sherr highlighted the opportunity to build on the existing strong foundation. “I’m very excited to be working as a Medical Advisor for T1D Exchange,” she said. “It’s a privilege to help shape what comes next for a group that’s already doing such impactful work.”  “Sharing what’s happening in clinical practice, benchmarking across centers, and understanding outcomes is how we figure out what’s working, what’s not, and where we go next,” she said.      The future of T1D care   With this team’s vision and expertise, T1D Exchange is positioned to accelerate progress in T1D care — bridging research and real-world practice to drive meaningful, measurable impact.  Together, we look forward to advancing innovation and improving outcomes for everyone affected by type 1 diabetes.   "

    3 days ago  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Improving Diabetes Care Through Precision Medicine 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 week ago 8 min read  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Bridging Research, Technology, and Real-World Care 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 week ago 9 min read  
    Insulin & Meds

    Ask the Expert: Diana Isaacs on Benefits, Risks, and Real-World Use of GLP-1s in T1D 

    Jewels Doskicz, 2 weeks ago 6 min read  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Advancing Equity, Improving Outcomes, and Reducing the Burden of T1D 

    Jewels Doskicz, 4 weeks ago 8 min read  
    Our team

    Spotlight on T1DX-QI: Clinical Leadership Committee 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 month ago 6 min read  

    28 Comments

    1. Lawrence S.

      Most of my supplies are covered by Medicare and my supplemental insurance. But, I have to pay the annual deductible, $250.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    2. Sheldon Schwartz

      Byram unreliable

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    3. Jennifer Beck

      I would have to pay out of pocket so I don’t have any backup supplies.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Shelly Smith

        Same here!

        2 years ago Log in to Reply
    4. Jian

      Medicare through a supply company here but they do not always send on time or have trouble getting them on time so I occasionally have bought a sensor on my own with no insurance help to hold me over because it isn’t worth the rigamarole to get it on time.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Jane Cerullo

        I use my pharmacy for Dexcom G7. Like it better. Don’t like being at mercy of mail order.

        2 years ago Log in to Reply
    5. Patricia Dalrymple

      They try to make me but I refuse. I fight and normally win. Have had to fight only since going to Medicare. You have to have the TIME to fight for yourself. It takes hours on the phone. But since retiring, I have the time. Sometimes it’s just a matter of who is going to submit the paperwork. My pharmacy fights over stuff like that with my endo’s office. I just keep driving from the office to the pharmacy until they are embarrassed (my endo’s office because I just show up and talk loudly so everyone in the office can hear me) or they give up because they know I will not. Very frustrating. The squeaky wheel and I’m sure they think I am obnoxious. I don’t care what they think.

      3
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Ahh Life

        TIME is money. If you value your time, how much are you spending? 💰

        2 years ago Log in to Reply
    6. Jane Cerullo

      Not sure what you mean by back supplies. I pay co pay for insulin and InPen. Changing to tandem pump as soon as all paperwork finished. Not sure what co pay will be.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    7. Katrina Mundinger

      I’ve chosen to simply because the supplies weren’t terribly expensive (<$30 USD), I'm not on a fixed income, and the hassle of getting reimbursed would take more time than the supplies cost.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    8. lis be

      insurance doesn’t cover glucagon.. so $300, It also doesn’t cover back up test strips when on dexcom, need those to calibrate or check if the dexcom is accurate on the first 2 and last 2 days.. those are about $60 a month, syringes, alcohol swabs. Doc recommended also having back up NPH in case the pump fails, but I cant afford to keep that supplied up.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    9. Marty

      I have to pay for Baqsimi because it not covered by my Medicare drug plan. I also bought a backup G7 sensor because Medicare only covers 9 sensors for 90 days and things happen. Fortunately, I’ve been able to accumulate enough of my other supplies over the years to feel I’d be safe in an emergency.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    10. Sue Martin

      When I didn’t have insurance a couple of years ago I had to pay out of pocket for everything. I’m grateful to have good insurance now.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    11. george lovelace

      More than 40 years ago ABIR

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    12. AimmcG

      On more than one occasion I have had to but CGM sensors because they expire too soon or one of them malfunctions and I don’t have another. Insurance won’t allow me to refill it early.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    13. ellencherry

      I buy my own test strips because my insurance doesn’t cover the Contour Next strips. I did a study and was given this meter. It’s very accurate and so much better than the one ins pays for. Costs about $30 / month.

      1
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Trina Blake

        Same here. The Contour Next is the best and most accurate. Prior to Dexcom G6, if I had a low alert (or high alert) I would do the obligatory fingerstick. I was also a 15-20 fingersticks a day person anyway (many because I checked whenever I was going to drive). The meter would read – as an example 180 when my Dexcom was at 70 with a downward arrow.
        Fortunately, I was on the invite list for ENDO CME. At one session the issue of accuracy in home monitors was discussed. Turns out the meter my health plan covered was shown (Diabetes Tech Society AACE) to read higher than actual for people with chronic anemia. So 15-20 fingersticks a day and I was having major lows. After taking home hard copies of the reports, I did my own comparison. Turns out the Dexcom and the Contour Next were very close. I was safer dosing from the Dexcom than from the One Touch. So I pay out of pocket for Contour

        2 years ago Log in to Reply
    14. Trina Blake

      About once a year I buy a 3-sensor box for my Dexcom, and a vial or two of humalog. Just to be safe.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    15. Lynn Smith

      I don’t think I have any backup supplies except for insulin. The doctor writes an rx for insulin based on an estimate of usage. So I end up with extra.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    16. Donna Condi

      Only one time did I have to purchase out of pocket Dexcom sensors when going on Medicare no one told me how long the switch would take and all the hoops you have to jump through including having to get the C-peptide test proving I really needed the insulin I had been taking the previous 23 years.

      1
      2 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. William Bennett

        Yeah, kinda the same for me (see my comment). I never had antibody or c-pep tests back when I was dx’d in 1983–AFAIK they weren’t even a thing. I’d gone from zero to DKA in about six weeks. It wasn’t a hard call. Big trepidation b/c the one time I did get c-pep tested it was normal range, but that wasn’t under the guidelines of fasting, time of day, etc. When I did have it re-tested it was way low. Not zero–some of us still produce some residual insulin–but well below the Medicare cut-off. Still, it’s kind of an insult. 40 years dealing with this every minute of my life, through every insulin regimen known to man, and suddenly I gotta PROVE I’m T1??? Just ask the endos I’ve been seeing the last several DECADES.

        2 years ago Log in to Reply
    17. Donna Condi

      I forgot about test strips. I have to purchase them and my meter because I have Dexcom and Medicare won’t pay for test strips anymore .

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    18. William Bennett

      Bought a box of Mio Advance insets back when I moved states and couldn’t get lined up with a new endo in time for Medicare to fill my script. Thinking about buying another box b/c I’ve switched to Tandem and they use the old-school Mio thwacker, which often hurts and results in bent cannulas far more often than the Advance does. Turns out you can use the Tandem tubing with an Advance inset, as the clips are identical. So there’s some wastage involved, but I only use them when I’ve run into problems with the Mio. Wish they’d all use standardized connectors at the pump end so we could choose, but that would be a heresy against capitalism apparently.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    19. JuJuB

      I mean… I always pay “out of pocket” b/c Insurance does not cover all costs. But I think the question means to ask “Have you paid outside of your insurance plan” or something like that. For me, I did it recently for the first time b/c Amazon Pharmacy (I’m a new member) said that the cost for 3 boxes of Dexcom sensors was over $300, when I use my insurance, but only $67 when I didn’t. Guess which I chose?!

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Gerald Wertz

        I am in between jobs and have been paying cash price for supplies over the last 4 months. Insurance coverage for the new job doesn’t begin for another 30 days. I have found that cash pricing can vary. Don’t be afraid to shop around. I usually pay about $100 for a box of G6 Sensors. About $150 for a month of infusion sets.

        1
        2 years ago Log in to Reply
    20. JuJuB

      Whups… I conveniently ignored the part where the question asked “back up” supplies. Only once… I was heading on a cruise and realized I had left my meter at home. So I bought a new meter and strips at Walgreen’s “just in case” my Dexcom failed. Meant to return them when we got back from the cruise, but I never did so… yeah, now they’re hanging around in my closet.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    21. Eva

      All the Blooming time. Ambetter doesn’t cover anything essential for type 1 diabetes – Fiasp no, dexcom no, baqsimi no, BG strips not in the quantity needed.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply
    22. T1D4LongTime

      I marked “Other”. My backup supplies are a long-acting pen which my endo provided and test strips (which I try to keep extra on hand). I’m sure I would have to pay for any backup supplies as I pay for all diabetic supplies now.

      2 years ago Log in to Reply

    Have you had to pay out of pocket for back up T1D-related supplies? Cancel reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.




    101 Federal Street, Suite 440
    Boston, MA 02110
    Phone: 617-892-6100
    Email: admin@t1dexchange.org

    Privacy Policy

    Terms of Use

    Follow Us

    • facebook
    • twitter
    • linkedin
    • instagram

    © 2024 T1D Exchange.
    All Rights Reserved.

    © 2023 T1D Exchange. All Rights Reserved.
    • Login
    • Register

    Forgot Password

    Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

    Skip Next Finish

    Account successfully created.

    Please check your inbox and verify your email in the next 24 hours.

    Your Account Type

    Please select all that apply.

    I have type 1 diabetes

    I'm a parent/guardian of a person with type 1 diabetes

    I'm interested in the diabetes community or industry

    Select Topics

    We will customize your stories feed based on what you select here.

    [userselectcat]

    We're preparing your personalized page.

    This will only take a second...

    Search and filter

    [searchandfilter slug="sort-filter-post"]