Subscribe Now

[hb-subscribe]

Trending News

T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
  • Activity
    • 1 day, 10 hours ago
      lis be likes your comment at
      How often do you change infusion or sensor sites earlier than recommended?
      Every 9 days I have to have to change an infusion set after one day use to switch the sensor to the other side - come on deccom you can do better
    • 1 day, 10 hours ago
      lis be likes your comment at
      How often do you change infusion or sensor sites earlier than recommended?
      Starting in 1996, my midriff has received more pounding than the Gaza strip. Both look similar. Consequently, I change frequently, every 2.5 days or so. Whatever the landscape will tolerate. 📄🖍️o(≧o≦)o🧸
    • 1 day, 10 hours ago
      lis be likes your comment at
      How often do you change infusion or sensor sites earlier than recommended?
      I change infusion sites every other day rather than every 4th day. I’ve been doing this for years after I started to see my insulin requirements increase dramatically on the 3rd day. It’s not really “earlier than recommended” since my endo agrees with this schedule and writes my prescriptions to accommodate it.
    • 1 day, 11 hours ago
      Ahh Life likes your comment at
      How often do you change infusion or sensor sites earlier than recommended?
      I usually extend them rather than cut their longevity short. I am insulin resistant and if I don't refill pump at day 2 I can't get to day 3-4. So, I usually use it a day longer than instructed due to the refill. And before moving to G7 I would restart my CGM and get an average of 14 days with some rare, 21 day uses in the mix. Sadly, Dexcom has figured out how to make more money off us by forcing a restart every 10 days with a transmitter built in.
    • 1 day, 13 hours ago
      Molly Jones likes your comment at
      How often do you change infusion or sensor sites earlier than recommended?
      I change my infusion site early if it's ripped off (obviously) or if I'm running high for no reason I can detect. Changing the site can sometimes help. I only change my CGM early if 1) it's going haywire with my numbers (reading high or low without cause) or 2) sometimes it's just convienant due to scheduling. But that's usually one day early.
    • 1 day, 16 hours ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How often do you change infusion or sensor sites earlier than recommended?
      Starting in 1996, my midriff has received more pounding than the Gaza strip. Both look similar. Consequently, I change frequently, every 2.5 days or so. Whatever the landscape will tolerate. 📄🖍️o(≧o≦)o🧸
    • 1 day, 17 hours ago
      Daniel Bestvater likes your comment at
      How often do you change infusion or sensor sites earlier than recommended?
      Starting in 1996, my midriff has received more pounding than the Gaza strip. Both look similar. Consequently, I change frequently, every 2.5 days or so. Whatever the landscape will tolerate. 📄🖍️o(≧o≦)o🧸
    • 1 day, 18 hours ago
      dholl62@gmail.com likes your comment at
      How often do you change infusion or sensor sites earlier than recommended?
      I change my infusion site early if it's ripped off (obviously) or if I'm running high for no reason I can detect. Changing the site can sometimes help. I only change my CGM early if 1) it's going haywire with my numbers (reading high or low without cause) or 2) sometimes it's just convienant due to scheduling. But that's usually one day early.
    • 1 day, 19 hours ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How often do you change infusion or sensor sites earlier than recommended?
      Sites on my legs seem to get irritated with resultant higher glucoses by day 2, so I often change out these sites every 2 rather than 3 days.
    • 1 day, 19 hours ago
      atr likes your comment at
      Would you be willing to participate in long-term research (1 year or longer)?
      I answered "maybe" because I am house bound and can do survey's online, but not in person. Also, I am 86 and not eligible for most research.
    • 1 day, 19 hours ago
      atr likes your comment at
      Would you be willing to participate in long-term research (1 year or longer)?
      Assuming I would live long enough to complete it — I’m going to be 80, but I’m a healthy, active T1D.
    • 1 day, 19 hours ago
      atr likes your comment at
      Would you be willing to participate in long-term research (1 year or longer)?
      All depends on location and age requirements
    • 1 day, 19 hours ago
      atr likes your comment at
      Would you be willing to participate in long-term research (1 year or longer)?
      Yes. At my age (according to the social security life expectancy table) I have 8.6 years left. Whew! Thank heavens for that point-six. 🍄🦋
    • 1 day, 20 hours ago
      atr likes your comment at
      How often do you change infusion or sensor sites earlier than recommended?
      Starting in 1996, my midriff has received more pounding than the Gaza strip. Both look similar. Consequently, I change frequently, every 2.5 days or so. Whatever the landscape will tolerate. 📄🖍️o(≧o≦)o🧸
    • 1 day, 20 hours ago
      Chrisanda likes your comment at
      How often do you change infusion or sensor sites earlier than recommended?
      Starting in 1996, my midriff has received more pounding than the Gaza strip. Both look similar. Consequently, I change frequently, every 2.5 days or so. Whatever the landscape will tolerate. 📄🖍️o(≧o≦)o🧸
    • 2 days, 11 hours ago
      Ahh Life likes your comment at
      Would you be willing to participate in long-term research (1 year or longer)?
      I answered "maybe" because I am house bound and can do survey's online, but not in person. Also, I am 86 and not eligible for most research.
    • 2 days, 11 hours ago
      Ahh Life likes your comment at
      Would you be willing to participate in long-term research (1 year or longer)?
      Assuming I would live long enough to complete it — I’m going to be 80, but I’m a healthy, active T1D.
    • 2 days, 13 hours ago
      Mary Thomson likes your comment at
      Would you be willing to participate in long-term research (1 year or longer)?
      I answered "maybe" because I am house bound and can do survey's online, but not in person. Also, I am 86 and not eligible for most research.
    • 2 days, 14 hours ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      Would you be willing to participate in long-term research (1 year or longer)?
      All depends on location and age requirements
    • 2 days, 15 hours ago
      Kristi Warmecke likes your comment at
      Would you be willing to participate in long-term research (1 year or longer)?
      All depends on location and age requirements
    • 2 days, 17 hours ago
      lis be likes your comment at
      If research results were shared directly with participants in plain language summaries, how valuable would that be to you?
      I don't have problems reading published results. I'm more concerned with information that doesn't get published or is just left out.
    • 2 days, 17 hours ago
      lis be likes your comment at
      If research results were shared directly with participants in plain language summaries, how valuable would that be to you?
      Why would you want to restrict plain language disclosure to participants? How about plain language for everybody?
    • 2 days, 18 hours ago
      Sarah Berry likes your comment at
      Would you be willing to participate in long-term research (1 year or longer)?
      Yes. At my age (according to the social security life expectancy table) I have 8.6 years left. Whew! Thank heavens for that point-six. 🍄🦋
    • 2 days, 18 hours ago
      Sarah Berry likes your comment at
      Would you be willing to participate in long-term research (1 year or longer)?
      All depends on location and age requirements
    • 2 days, 19 hours ago
      Laurie B likes your comment at
      Would you be willing to participate in long-term research (1 year or longer)?
      All depends on location and age requirements
    Clear All
Pages
    • T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
    • Articles
    • Community
      • About
      • Insights
      • T1D Screening
        • T1D Screening How-To
        • T1D Screening Results
        • T1D Screening Resources
      • Donate
      • Join the Community
    • Quality Improvement
      • About
      • Collaborative
        • Leadership
        • Committees
      • Centers
      • Meet the Experts
      • Learning Sessions
      • Resources
        • Change Packages
        • Sick Day Guide
        • FOH Screener
        • T1D Care Plans
      • Portal
      • Health Equity
        • Heal Advisors
    • Registry
      • About
      • Recruit for the Registry
    • Research
      • About
      • Publications
      • COVID-19 Research
      • Our Initiatives
    • Partnerships
      • About
      • Industry Partnerships
      • Academic Partnerships
      • Previous Work
    • About
      • Team
      • Board of Directors
      • Culture & Careers
      • Annual Report
    • Join / Login
    • Search
    • Donate

    How important is the time-in-range measurement to you?

    Home > LC Polls > How important is the time-in-range measurement to you?
    Previous

    Based on your experiences with customer service representatives from insurance companies, do you feel that they understand the needs of people with T1D?

    Next

    If your area observes Daylight Savings Time, do you typically see any impact on your blood sugar?

    Sarah Howard

    Sarah Howard has worked in the diabetes research field ever since she was diagnosed with T1D while in college in May 2013. Since then, she has worked for various diabetes organizations, focusing on research, advocacy, and community-building efforts for people with T1D and their loved ones. Sarah is currently the Senior Marketing Manager at T1D Exchange.

    Related Stories

    Advocacy

    Meet the Expert: Advancing Equity, Technology Access, and Connection in Diabetes Care 

    Jewels Doskicz, 2 days ago 11 min read  
    News

    A Nutritionist in Your Pocket: How One Family’s T1D Journey Inspired the Creation of SNAQ 

    Michael Howerton, 2 weeks ago 4 min read  
    Lifestyle

    Finding Strength in the Journey: The Unexpected Upside of Living with Type 1 Diabetes 

    Jewels Doskicz, 3 weeks ago 5 min read  
    News

    What’s Keeping Glucagon Out of Reach for Many with T1D? 

    Jewels Doskicz, 4 weeks ago 6 min read  
    News

    Thinking About Type 1 Diabetes Autoantibody Screening? Here’s What to Consider 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 month ago 9 min read  
    2025 Learning Session

    T1DX-QI 2025 November Learning Session Abstracts 

    QI Team at T1D Exchange, 1 month ago 1 min read  

    16 Comments

    1. Bob Durstenfeld

      I know that Time in Range is new, but it makes a lot more sense than the 3-month HbA1C.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    2. connie ker

      The CGMs show time in range with the percent of highs and lows. I use the Abbott Freestyle Libre because I am a senior and think how far we have come with technology to help diabetics. My fingers say thank you each and every scan. I live alone so this CGM helps me feel more confident in doing so. I know when to correct with insulin and when to eat a snack. Because I have a Jitterbug Flip phone without apps and data, this Freestye Libre works for me.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    3. Patricia Dalrymple

      I tried the CGMs when they first came out and I could never get them calibrated and they hurt – I am thin. However, they’ve come a long way and while I don’t really want to stick another device in my body, I go low a few times a week and I know I need one. Am waiting two more years until I am on Medicare.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    4. Greg Felton

      Taking it one game at a time!

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    5. Grey Gray

      TIR is much more helpful than a1c for me. A good A1C may have meant I was hypoglycemic alot of the time with super high peaks, from over treating the low bg. Or what I lovingly refer to as yo-yoing. I believe the new gold standard is 70% TIR. MM 670g automode keeps me there or close. A1C of 7.2 Been running automode for about 5 months.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    6. Thomas Hatton

      I use TIR more than A1C. The Minimed app shows how much over or under I am. It is a daily indicator. It helps.me have better overall control.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    7. Pat Reynolds

      I use the fixed tir of HappyBob to see “at a glance” and 3.9 to 8.9 to see on Clarity (aiming for 70% in range). But also waning to see now “very lows” – would mark that as a fail day even if achieving 70% in range, and minimal “very high”

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    8. Pat Reynolds

      As important is Standard Deviation. I like to be under 2, over 2.5 something’s wrong … Hba1c is a poor indicator, compared to these three (for, very lows (count) and SD.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    9. George Lovelace

      With Dex G6 coupling with Tandem X2 the TIR is the Key number along with SD. I’ve eliminated all Lows.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    10. Trina Blake

      TIR is very important to me, I’ve been Dexcom’ing saince 2009 (back when the receiver for the Dexcom 7 was an oval, rather bulky device). As was mentioned above, you could have a great A1C that was the “result” of major highs and major lows offsetting one another (say your goal is an A1C of 5 if your bg’s run 5, 5, and 5, But you also get an A1C of 5 if your bg’s run 0, 5, and 10). Hav ing the TIR info from T-Connect reports allowed me to counter (offensive) comments by an Endo saying it was impossible for someone like me to have such good labs. My health plan wasn’t covering Dexcom so I paid out of pocket since I already was using it and saw the value. Whipping out my reports (and you can’t fake them unless you have a non-D person wear it for you) shut him right up. I set my own desired range, and of course using the “standard” range of 60-160 I am in range 99% of the time. With my own range, perhaps 90% (my range is 60-120).

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    11. Tb-well

      Time in range is a useful measure, but unless it includes a readout of time frames out of range, it is only part of the picture. It needs to be included with time out of range by time frame and percentage.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    12. Mary Ann Sayers

      I’ve only had the TANDEM Basal IQ for less than 2 weeks, but being out of range is more common than in! I’ve used the temp rate a few times to increase my basal to match my needs. I’m looking forward to the Quality IQ which will automatically increase my basal!!! I am thankful for the Basal IQ which suspends my basal when I’m heading below range and resumes it when my graph shows my CGM is heading in the right direction.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    13. Patricia Maddix

      Medical professionals really emphasize the value of the time in range and after using it for the last few months I really find it valuable. I have the CLARITY app for my Dexcom and frequently look at this to compare all the way from two days to 90 days to see improvements when I tweak my insulin or food. I find being able to look at the percentage of high and low blood sugars to be great information. I recently switched from hot cooked grits as my standard breakfast to old fashion oatmeal and now have very little rise in blood sugar after breakfast. I was even able to increase my portion and of course increased insulin as well but still I have very little rise after breakfast.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    14. Sally Numrich

      I focus on time in range and standard deviation. Those two will tell how I am doing with my treatment plan. Yes, each of us has a different range we shoot for which is why these two numbers are my numbers and can’t really compare them to others. It is my treatment plan, a plan that works for me and my life.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    15. ConnieT1D62

      Important. TIR makes much more day to day sense than vague generalization of A1C measurement.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    16. Cheryl Seibert

      Time in Range (TIR) is the most important measurement to use as a goal for blood glucose control. A1C is an average so if BGs are wildly ranging from 300+ to under 45 and you have more lows than highs or more time in the low range than the high range, your A1C measurement is not accurate as a measure of control. TIR combined with Standard Deviation (how much your BGs vary from an average of say 110) is the most accurate indicator of good control available today. It is important to remember that a NON-DIABETIC’s BGs also rise and fall with meals and stress, so trying to obtain that “flat line” even after meals is not something a diabetic should obsess about.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply

    How important is the time-in-range measurement to you? Cancel reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.




    101 Federal Street, Suite 440
    Boston, MA 02110
    Phone: 617-892-6100
    Email: admin@t1dexchange.org

    Privacy Policy

    Terms of Use

    Follow Us

    • facebook
    • twitter
    • linkedin
    • instagram

    © 2024 T1D Exchange.
    All Rights Reserved.

    © 2023 T1D Exchange. All Rights Reserved.
    • Login
    • Register

    Forgot Password

    Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

    Skip Next Finish

    Account successfully created.

    Please check your inbox and verify your email in the next 24 hours.

    Your Account Type

    Please select all that apply.

    I have type 1 diabetes

    I'm a parent/guardian of a person with type 1 diabetes

    I'm interested in the diabetes community or industry

    Select Topics

    We will customize your stories feed based on what you select here.

    [userselectcat]

    We're preparing your personalized page.

    This will only take a second...

    Search and filter

    [searchandfilter slug="sort-filter-post"]