Subscribe Now

[hb-subscribe]

Trending News

T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
  • Activity
    • 10 hours, 38 minutes ago
      KarenM6 likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Sorry. I'm not sold on AI. I don't trust the people making it. There are too many reasons it could go wrong and be disasterous (just read the above comments). I'm not opposed to computers helping with things such as Control IQ, but when the computer starts doing the thinking, I think we've crossed the line. An aside: I've listened to AI music, and I think it sounds impersonal. It lacks a humanness. I don't find it pleasant to listen to. I've heard horror stories about AI being used by the military, with the end result being nuclear holocaust. I am a hard NO to AI. I gave it a "5".
    • 10 hours, 39 minutes ago
      KarenM6 likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 10 hours, 40 minutes ago
      KarenM6 likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Here's my concern. I've used AI when meeting new clients to take notes of my meetings while I'm talking with the client. Ostensibly, this frees me up from having to jot down notes while talking - allowing me to give my full attention to the conversation. (Very good benefit of AI) Then, when reviewing the notes, AI literally fabricated scenarios that weren't discussed (AI Hallucinations are a very bad side effect). Not knowing when AI will fabricate a fact pattern gives me great concern that AI will fabricate a glucose reading and then act on that hallucination. AI has great potential, but it's not ready yet.
    • 16 hours, 35 minutes ago
      D-connect likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      I have an MA in writing and lit, but gobbledegook is gobbledegook. The fancy term is obscurantism.
    • 16 hours, 35 minutes ago
      D-connect likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      They change all the time. Generally not in a direction to improve my health, but to increase the money in their wallet.
    • 16 hours, 37 minutes ago
      D-connect likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 17 hours, 25 minutes ago
      Ahh Life likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      I have an MA in writing and lit, but gobbledegook is gobbledegook. The fancy term is obscurantism.
    • 17 hours, 25 minutes ago
      Ahh Life likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      Extremely. I have a certificate in Medical Billing & Coding.
    • 21 hours, 5 minutes ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      "Slightly," I think, maybe. Insurance companies change their policies, constantly. Prescription coverage changes every time I look at it. Medicare is a huge question mark. Honestly, Health insurance has become a big money making business, for them. I get different answers every time I call, depending upon whom I am talking with. I say it's time for socialized medicine.
    • 21 hours, 6 minutes ago
      atr likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 21 hours, 18 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Roughly half my lows are caused by my auto correct system now. I expect AI hallucinations to make it worse. I have enough hallucinations when I'm low and need non-hallucinatory help. We all need more info on this subject to make better decisions. As my favorite 80's AI robot (Johnny 5) said, "Need input."
    • 21 hours, 18 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I'm not comfortable for many reasons: 1) AI hasn't proven respects boundaries, quite the opposite, too many reports of AI tend to view its responsibilities and decisions as NOT mine; 2) the companies behind AI systems do likewise in not respecting my data as mine and jumble it in with their own; 3) AI systems haven't proven themselves as reliable parties regarding data and actions. There are many more; AI systems have a long way to go before I entrust one with dosing strategies while I'm awake, let alone while I'm asleep!
    • 21 hours, 19 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I’ve done a large 2 week focus group through Syracuse University on AI. I’ve also been watching shows on European news about AI and medical issues. AI still has too many glitches when it comes to medical issues.
    • 21 hours, 34 minutes ago
      TEH likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 21 hours, 40 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Having recently dealt with ongoing tech issues involving our heat and electrical-use notifications for more than six months — and it’s still not fully resolved — I’m not always a fan of too much technology. That said, I am interested in advances like the Twist Insulin Pump potentially detecting scar tissue or helping with infusion-site issues. But then reality kicks in: taking devices off for MRIs, replacing failed equipment, and navigating Medicare when it’s primary insurance can become a nightmare of paperwork and delays. And honestly, AI in some call centers has been pretty frustrating. Sometimes it feels like no one can answer a real-world question anymore. I think we should tread lightly and make sure technology actually makes life easier for people living with T1D — especially older adults who already manage enough complexity every day. Some days I think about a less stress free life and going back to a syringe and insulin. over 45 years of doing that, and now 25+ of devices, I'm tired of the challenges in getting replacements, and scar tissue, and mail order supplies and on and on.
    • 21 hours, 52 minutes ago
      Lawrence S. likes your comment at
      How well do you understand the details of your health insurance coverage?
      At the risk of being overly simplistic, it boils down to: "Heads, you lose. Tails, You lose." ╰── ──╮
    • 1 day, 17 hours ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all technical advancements there are good things and bad things. The bad things (unforseen consequences) could be deadly like Hallucinations for the user, getting over doses of insulin. So, carefully thought out guard rails need to be developed and thoroughly tested. A good thing must be the accumulation of scenarios that KSannie mentioned. However it can not be completely autonomous. The current accuracy of Dex G7 and other sensors introduce error in to the calculations. This is similar to "self driving cars." The Robo taxi experiments have shown the unusual events that could become dangerous. Either audible situation commands or textual inputs like "goin to bed" or "driving" or "exercising" may be required at the beginning for a new user. As an example, after wearing my smart watch for a year now, it recognizes exercising without me having to tell it I'm exercising. This drives a more advanced and improved user interface. The other perceivable advantage might be accumulating changes over time, such as sicknesses, weight gain or loss, or changes in activity. Changes in food intake might be difficult to overcome. Something like "Under my Fork" app. Personally, I would like to see a reminder to bolis before eating! With all that said, we do we need all that? Probably not. Evolution of modified closed loop control may eliminate the need for AI control. The reality may be somewhere in-between the two.
    • 1 day, 17 hours ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    • 1 day, 17 hours ago
      kristina blake likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I’m uncomfortable not knowing when and when it isn’t being used, but I’m not sure why really. A “singer” named Benny Rivers popped up in one of my feeds. I really liked the music, until I found out it was a total AI fabrication. Then I was uncomfortable. Why? I felt “taken”, like someone pulled a fast one on me, pulled the wool over my eyes. I liked the music less then. I didn’t like that I couldn’t find a tour date, things like that. But I was most uncomfortable not truly understanding why it made me uncomfortable. The music was still enjoyable.
    • 1 day, 19 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Having recently dealt with ongoing tech issues involving our heat and electrical-use notifications for more than six months — and it’s still not fully resolved — I’m not always a fan of too much technology. That said, I am interested in advances like the Twist Insulin Pump potentially detecting scar tissue or helping with infusion-site issues. But then reality kicks in: taking devices off for MRIs, replacing failed equipment, and navigating Medicare when it’s primary insurance can become a nightmare of paperwork and delays. And honestly, AI in some call centers has been pretty frustrating. Sometimes it feels like no one can answer a real-world question anymore. I think we should tread lightly and make sure technology actually makes life easier for people living with T1D — especially older adults who already manage enough complexity every day. Some days I think about a less stress free life and going back to a syringe and insulin. over 45 years of doing that, and now 25+ of devices, I'm tired of the challenges in getting replacements, and scar tissue, and mail order supplies and on and on.
    • 1 day, 19 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all technical advancements there are good things and bad things. The bad things (unforseen consequences) could be deadly like Hallucinations for the user, getting over doses of insulin. So, carefully thought out guard rails need to be developed and thoroughly tested. A good thing must be the accumulation of scenarios that KSannie mentioned. However it can not be completely autonomous. The current accuracy of Dex G7 and other sensors introduce error in to the calculations. This is similar to "self driving cars." The Robo taxi experiments have shown the unusual events that could become dangerous. Either audible situation commands or textual inputs like "goin to bed" or "driving" or "exercising" may be required at the beginning for a new user. As an example, after wearing my smart watch for a year now, it recognizes exercising without me having to tell it I'm exercising. This drives a more advanced and improved user interface. The other perceivable advantage might be accumulating changes over time, such as sicknesses, weight gain or loss, or changes in activity. Changes in food intake might be difficult to overcome. Something like "Under my Fork" app. Personally, I would like to see a reminder to bolis before eating! With all that said, we do we need all that? Probably not. Evolution of modified closed loop control may eliminate the need for AI control. The reality may be somewhere in-between the two.
    • 1 day, 19 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      Sorry. I'm not sold on AI. I don't trust the people making it. There are too many reasons it could go wrong and be disasterous (just read the above comments). I'm not opposed to computers helping with things such as Control IQ, but when the computer starts doing the thinking, I think we've crossed the line. An aside: I've listened to AI music, and I think it sounds impersonal. It lacks a humanness. I don't find it pleasant to listen to. I've heard horror stories about AI being used by the military, with the end result being nuclear holocaust. I am a hard NO to AI. I gave it a "5".
    • 1 day, 19 hours ago
      Natalie Daley likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I am comfortable using AI as a helpful tool, while fully cognizant of hallucinatory tendencies. If I may paraphrase a famous writer about a week ago analyzing universities (as well as AI): “the over-intellectualized nature of academic culture—the idea that all inquiry should be depersonalized, dispassionate, data-driven, objective. Being a good person is more about having the right emotions, perceptions, and intentions toward others in the concrete circumstances of life than it is about logic-chopping games and dry dissertations.” 𐚁
    • 1 day, 20 hours ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      With all the deliberately misleading information out there, AI cannot discriminate. And, each patient is completely different in their rate of things like food digestion or insulin absorption. AI really is not up to this. And it cannot differentiate between highs due to stress of traveling, which go down as soon as I arrive, and highs due to illness, which can stay high for days, and gradually taper to normal at some variable rate. Once I was high due to illness, got better and then worse. I am afraid of getting too much insulin. It lasts 5 hours in the blood, including the basal amount. And the AI not being able to correct fast enough.
    • 1 day, 20 hours ago
      Kathy Hanavan likes your comment at
      How comfortable are you, on a scale of 1–5, with artificial intelligence (AI) being integrated into your diabetes technology?
      I believe that AI may very well become a great tool - but at this time it still makes too many errors for me to be confident in it.
    Clear All
Pages
    • T1D Exchange T1D Exchange T1D Exchange
    • Articles
    • Community
      • About
      • Insights
      • T1D Screening
        • T1D Screening How-To
        • T1D Screening Results
        • T1D Screening Resources
      • Donate
      • Join the Community
    • Quality Improvement
      • About
      • Collaborative
        • Leadership
        • Committees
      • Centers
      • Meet the Experts
      • Learning Sessions
      • Resources
        • Change Packages
        • Sick Day Guide
        • FOH Screener
        • T1D Care Plans
      • Portal
      • Health Equity
        • Heal Advisors
    • Registry
      • About
      • Recruit for the Registry
    • Research
      • About
      • Publications
      • COVID-19 Research
      • Our Initiatives
    • Partnerships
      • About
      • Industry Partnerships
      • Academic Partnerships
      • Previous Work
    • About
      • Team
      • Board of Directors
      • Culture & Careers
      • Annual Report
    • Join / Login
    • Search
    • Donate

    If CGMs existed when you were diagnosed with T1D and you wanted to use one, did you have to wait to get a CGM for any reason? Select all of the below options that apply to you, and share your experience in the comments.

    Home > LC Polls > If CGMs existed when you were diagnosed with T1D and you wanted to use one, did you have to wait to get a CGM for any reason? Select all of the below options that apply to you, and share your experience in the comments.
    Previous

    Do you notice changes to your blood glucose levels when you have a sunburn?

    Next

    If you (or your loved one) lived with T1D as a child, at what age did you start dosing insulin without help from an adult?

    Sarah Howard

    Sarah Howard has worked in the diabetes research field ever since she was diagnosed with T1D while in college in May 2013. Since then, she has worked for various diabetes organizations, focusing on research, advocacy, and community-building efforts for people with T1D and their loved ones. Sarah is currently the Senior Marketing Manager at T1D Exchange.

    Related Stories

    " At T1D Exchange, we’re proud to announce our Medical and Research Advisory Team — an accomplished group of leaders in endocrinology, research, and quality improvement. Together, they are redefining what’s possible in type 1 diabetes (T1D) care through rigorous data analysis, innovative research approaches, and real-world implementation. Their collective expertise is central to our mission of improving outcomes for all people living with T1D.  “We’re excited to be working with our advisors given their deep expertise across a broad range of areas in T1D,” said Dave Walton, CEO of T1D Exchange. “Their involvement magnifies our reach, knowledge, and impact. These advisors are shaping the future of diabetes care — driving innovation across research, clinical practice, and quality improvement.”    Meet the Medical & Research Advisory Team  The T1D Exchange Medical and Research Advisory Team brings together four leading endocrinologists, each offering a unique perspective and shared commitment to advancing T1D care:    Jenise Wong, MD, PhD Pediatric endocrinologist at UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at the University of California, San Francisco Focus areas: Diabetes technology adoption and usability; health equity and access to care and technology; community-based and peer-support interventions; culturally responsive care          Jennifer Sherr, MD, PhD Pediatric endocrinologist at Yale Medicine and Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology at Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut Focus areas: Clinical trials in diabetes technology (CGM and AID systems), disease-modifying treatments and immunotherapies, and emerging technologies and medications, including continuous ketone monitoring and nasal glucagon     Viral Shah, MD Adult endocrinologist at Indiana University Health and Professor of Medicine in the Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism at Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis, Indiana Focus areas: Diabetes technology and adjunctive therapy trials; translational and data-driven research; T1D complications and bone health         Nestoras Mathioudakis, MD, MHS Adult endocrinologist at Johns Hopkins Medicine and Associate Professor of Medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland Focus areas: AI-driven clinical support tools; EMR-based data analytics for clinical decision making; data-driven quality improvement; health equity in T1D care        This accomplished team’s expertise spans adult and pediatric endocrinology, research, and quality improvement affiliated with leading institutions nationwide. Collectively, they have authored over 500 diabetes publications and secured research funding from organizations such as the National Institutes of Health, Helmsley Charitable Trust, the American Diabetes Association, and Breakthrough T1D — while remaining actively engaged in both clinical care and research.  “These individuals represent an impressive body of work while remaining deeply involved in the day-to-day realities of diabetes care,” said Walton. Their expertise covers the full spectrum of T1D care — from AI and predictive analytics to complication prevention, automated insulin delivery, continuous glucose and ketone monitoring, GLP-1 treatments, health equity, mental health, autoantibody screening, and disease prevention.    Turning insight into impact  The team’s work goes beyond research, focusing on translating insights into real-world practice. By leveraging data to scale best practices, the goal is to drive meaningful, measurable change across clinics and communities.  “Our advisors will help to extend our impact — whether through QI strategy, research innovation, funding opportunities, or new data-driven solutions,” said Walton. “We want to take what’s working at individual centers and spread that as broadly as possible.”   He added, “As a Collaborative, we’re also focused on advanced population health strategies such as exploring predictive data models to identify risks earlier and intervene before complications even begin to happen.”    The power of the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative  Central to this work is the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative (T1DX-QI) — a nationwide network of clinics working together to improve care through shared data, benchmarking, and evidence-based practices.  “I’m thrilled to serve as a Medical Advisor for T1D Exchange, because I’ve seen firsthand the impact this network can have on patient care,” said Dr. Nestoras Mathioudakis. “T1D Exchange is the premier organization for quality improvement in type 1 diabetes, with unparalleled assets like a large EHR database and robust patient registry.”  He added that he is excited to apply his expertise in EHR research and big data analytics to generate real-world evidence across diagnosis, management, and outcomes.  Dr. Viral Shah echoed that perspective, reflecting on T1DX-QI's evolution: “I have been involved with T1D Exchange since its early days and have had the privilege of witnessing how it has transformed the quality of diabetes care across the United States. I’m delighted to return as a Medical Advisor.”  He emphasized the importance of accelerating impact. “I look forward to working closely with the team to accelerate the evidence generation and to help translate these insights to improve patient care.”   Dr. Jenise Wong highlighted the visible impact of T1DX-QI on the delivery of care. "I’m truly honored and grateful to be working with T1D Exchange as a Medical Advisor. T1DX-QI is a remarkable resource for centers that are using continuous process improvement to improve the quality of care for people living with diabetes.”  “Diabetes centers working with T1DX –QI have done amazing work using QI methodology to make care accessible and equitable for all people with diabetes,” she said. “It’s inspiring to be a part of a collaborative in which centers have been creative and thoughtful with initiatives to address individual and systemic challenges to care, improving clinical outcomes as well as the patient experience."  Looking ahead, Dr. Sherr highlighted the opportunity to build on the existing strong foundation. “I’m very excited to be working as a Medical Advisor for T1D Exchange,” she said. “It’s a privilege to help shape what comes next for a group that’s already doing such impactful work.”  “Sharing what’s happening in clinical practice, benchmarking across centers, and understanding outcomes is how we figure out what’s working, what’s not, and where we go next,” she said.      The future of T1D care   With this team’s vision and expertise, T1D Exchange is positioned to accelerate progress in T1D care — bridging research and real-world practice to drive meaningful, measurable impact.  Together, we look forward to advancing innovation and improving outcomes for everyone affected by type 1 diabetes.   "

    4 days ago  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Improving Diabetes Care Through Precision Medicine 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 week ago 8 min read  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Bridging Research, Technology, and Real-World Care 

    Jewels Doskicz, 2 weeks ago 9 min read  
    Insulin & Meds

    Ask the Expert: Diana Isaacs on Benefits, Risks, and Real-World Use of GLP-1s in T1D 

    Jewels Doskicz, 2 weeks ago 6 min read  
    Meet the Expert

    Meet the Expert: Advancing Equity, Improving Outcomes, and Reducing the Burden of T1D 

    Jewels Doskicz, 4 weeks ago 8 min read  
    Our team

    Spotlight on T1DX-QI: Clinical Leadership Committee 

    Jewels Doskicz, 1 month ago 6 min read  

    25 Comments

    1. Nevin Bowman

      Glucose meters weren’t even available when I was diagnosed 😀

      2
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. George Lovelace

        I guess there were Lab Tests back in 1964 but for Home Testing all you could get is Urine Tests that only told you how badly you were managing T1

        3
        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    2. Patricia Dalrymple

      I’m unsure if they existed but one wasn’t suggested for a few years after LADA diagnosis. I’ve tried them twice and find them uncomfortable and difficult to calibrate. Plus, if I’m awakened in the night, I don’t want it to keep alarming after I have eaten. It has been awhile since I tried one and I’m sure all my complaints are user error. Will have to give it a go again since I need help with my times in range.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Sherolyn Newell

        I’ve only had Dexcom G6, but I am happy with it. You might want to check into it. It seems accurate nearly all the time. I hardly ever do finger sticks any more.

        1
        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    3. Siri Lachmansingh

      I was only offered the use of a CGM when I was having a hard time controlling my sugars, and I had to borrow it from the clinic I went to. It was big and bulky, I don’t remember liking it at all or if it helped.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    4. Sherolyn Newell

      Up until the Dexcom G6, they all said you still had to do finger sticks for insulin dosing. It seemed silly to me to do both, so I didn’t get one. Then when G6 said you could use it for dosing, I got one. I am 99% happy with it.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    5. Mary Dexter

      I wanted to use a CGM at the very first, but was put off by my CDEs. For some reason, I had to first qualify (show expertise) to use a Medtronic pump and use it for a number of years before the CDE would even consider it. Then I had to accumulate enough serious lows to satisfy the insurance company and go through the appeal process, because they never grant the first request. When I complained to a subsequent CDE about the difficulties and inaccuracies of Medtronic, she showed me her Dexcom, but said I probably wouldn’t be able to get one. It took several more years and another request and appeal with insurance before I finally got my Dexcom. I quit pumping around the same time and have been happily using the Dexcom and insulin pens for the last decade.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    6. Sahran Holiday

      Was diagnosed many years before CGMs were available. Physician prescribed and insurance approved as soon as available.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    7. jeredb

      Did not exist when I was diagnosed (1990). I started on Dexcom G5 about 4 years ago and loved it – wished I’d looked into them sooner. Switched go G6 as soon as they were available. They are a game changer and I recommend a CGM to everyone I talk to that has diabetes or knows someone with diabetes. They’re expensive but if you can afford it they’re a must have! I am sure eventually price will come down and everyone will be able to get them – much as meters did over time.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    8. Maggie Morgan

      I was diagnosed at 11 and insurance would not approve until I was at least 16, and even then I needed special written permission from by pediatric endocrinologist.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    9. Lawrence Stearns

      This is an interesting story. I was diagnosed in July, 1977. There were no CGM’s, only urine test trips (which were close to useless). In 2008 (not sure of the year), my insurance company would not cover a CGM, which was a new product at the time. Subsequently, in 2008, I had a low blood sugar and fell while at work and broke my leg. I called the insurance company while I was convalescing at home and told them that if I had a CGM, I probably would not have fallen and broken my leg. The insurance company immediately approve the CGM for me.

      3
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
      1. Bill Williams

        Insurance companies STILL don’t understand Type 1/

        1
        5 years ago Log in to Reply
    10. Chris Bullock

      My personal belief if Dexcoms need to be given as soon as one is diagnosed. I have been living with type1 going on for 34 years and have seen a lot but the Dexcom has provided one thing none others have trending alerts. I wish I would have had this growing up since back in the 80s my BS was a bit more fluctuation but once I got my Dexcom I was completely happy with it. An with more pumps working with it it has been a blessing from the ole days

      3
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    11. Jneticdiabetic

      CGMs weren’t around when I was diagnosed in 1995. Pumps were also not as common then. My endo recommended, but I was hesitant to wear one at first. About 4-5 years post my diagnosis and many severe hypos later, I agreed. It then took about a year of appeals with my insurance company to get it approved. Getting a pump probably saved my life. I didn’t have another severe low for me than a decade.
      I work in a diabetes clinic/research center and had an opportunity to try the early Medtronic professional CGMs. They were big with a cord connecting to sensor (no blue tooth back then). You had to put it in a plastic bag to shower. No readings were displayed, had to wait for download by doctors office. It c was a start! I was able to get the early Medtronic real- CGM when I was pregnant. Helpful, but it was not very accurate so didn’t keep up with it. Later got a Dexcom G4 and was very happy with it. Currently use a Medtronic 670g pump/sensor.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    12. Amanda Barras

      I answered 2 ways.
      1. CGM was not developed yet in 1988.
      2. Once CGM was available my insurance wouldn’t cover it anyway and I had to wait until 2012 to have an insurance who would cover it. I tried to get it in 2007 but I’d have to pay out of pocket and couldn’t afford it then.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    13. Janis Senungetuk

      I was dx in 1955, long before personal glucose meters, much less CGMs. In 2015 I asked my MD to prescribe the Dexcom CGM. It took a battle with insurance but eventually I was able to start with the G5 system. Now I’m using the G6 in sync with the Tandem t:slim X2 pump. As long as the tech all works as advertised, I’m very happy.

      1
      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    14. JoAnn

      I was in a new state seeing my new dentist I had a very scary emergency sitting in the chair as my bg dropped to the 40’s She ended up calling my husband and an ambulance for me
      After this terrifying scare…I had to do something so I started searching on the internet for help
      I discovered cgm’s on Facebook T1 groups and asked my family doctor to order it
      My insurance covered it
      I’m so appreciative to have the device

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    15. Tina Roberts

      I started one as soon as diagnosed but it was medtronic back in 2007. The sensors were so inaccurate and woke me up all through the night with alarms that I quit using them for years.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    16. NancyT

      Technology has changed so much since I was diagnosed in 1961! 🤓 The only way of getting any sort of glucose reading at home in those days was by testing urine. This actually involved boiling the specimen with a chemical solution in a test tube to compare with a color chart.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    17. Molly Jones

      I wasn’t aware of CGM’s from the book’s I read as they were published @2000. When I started complaining about the extreme variability of my blood sugar, differing insulin sensitivities and the unknown causes, my doctor suggested using one and it was covered by my insurance.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    18. Britni

      CGM’s didn’t exist when I was diagnosed, but even after they were release I waited a long time before trying one. I’m scared of needles and was nervous bout having to insert the sensor. It wasn’t until I heard about the Libre that I decided to give one a try

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    19. Beth Franz

      Other – diagnosed in 2018. I was given zero help or information on how to dose insulin much less what a cgm was or how to get one. I had to do all the research and call my insurance to see what I could get. After horrible inaccuracy with the Libre – went on Dexcom with better accuracy results – but only after MUCH research of my own on how to manage it.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    20. Leona Hanson

      When I was diagnosed I didn’t need one at the time and then when I need one the insurance didn’t didn’t cover the cgm and now I’m waiting for my doctor come back from a family emergency to get the script to get one finally after 8years of waiting. Ok otherwise I couldn’t afford one

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    21. Brandon Denson

      I did not have a choice to get an insulin pump when I was diagnosed in 2004. I inquired about it after the nurse shared with me that they had a device that could administer my insulin without me having to take a shot every time.

      I insisted to get one but they said that I needed to live with type 1 for a year to learn how to manage it. I’ve always been involved with technology so I truly believe this would have helped me out of the gate.

      When I first found out about a CGM, I had one immediately. It was a complete game-changer. In the beginning, it wasn’t the accuracy that I expected but things have changed tremendously over the years.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply
    22. NAK Marshall

      I got my first meter at age 32 (diagnosed at age 9 in 1960) and when cgm came out I jumped on and haven’t looked back (except when a reading seems really off). I was ready and willing to pay out of pocket if necessary to keep it once I reached medicare age and had stockpiled what I could, but luckily Dexcom was approved shortly before my stockpile ran out once I was eligible. I did write many emails and letters to all kinds of government involved people and congress, etc during the 2 years before medicare kicked in for me.

      5 years ago Log in to Reply

    If CGMs existed when you were diagnosed with T1D and you wanted to use one, did you have to wait to get a CGM for any reason? Select all of the below options that apply to you, and share your experience in the comments. Cancel reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.




    101 Federal Street, Suite 440
    Boston, MA 02110
    Phone: 617-892-6100
    Email: admin@t1dexchange.org

    Privacy Policy

    Terms of Use

    Follow Us

    • facebook
    • twitter
    • linkedin
    • instagram

    © 2024 T1D Exchange.
    All Rights Reserved.

    © 2023 T1D Exchange. All Rights Reserved.
    • Login
    • Register

    Forgot Password

    Registration confirmation will be emailed to you.

    Skip Next Finish

    Account successfully created.

    Please check your inbox and verify your email in the next 24 hours.

    Your Account Type

    Please select all that apply.

    I have type 1 diabetes

    I'm a parent/guardian of a person with type 1 diabetes

    I'm interested in the diabetes community or industry

    Select Topics

    We will customize your stories feed based on what you select here.

    [userselectcat]

    We're preparing your personalized page.

    This will only take a second...

    Search and filter

    [searchandfilter slug="sort-filter-post"]